FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Realme GT Neo vs Ulefone Armor 3WT
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Realme GT Neo on one side and the Ulefone Armor 3WT on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.1GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Realme GT Neo | Ulefone Armor 3WT | ||||||
| Model version(s) | RMX3031 |
Armor 3WT, Armor_3WT |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2021 | Q3 2019 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE | CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,24 x 2,89 x 0,33 in | 6,49 x 3,12 x 0,72 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.31 oz | 13.33 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, plastic body |
Front glass, aluminum body |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.4 inches, 16M colours | 5.7 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | IPS LCD | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2160 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 18:9 | ||||||
| Density | 409 ppi | 424 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 11; Realme UI 2 | Android 9 (Pie) | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6893 Dimensity 1200 | MediaTek MT6771V Helio P70 | ||||||
| Lithography | 6 nm N6 | 12 nm HPM | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 1x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 3.0 GHz 3x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.6 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.1 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G77 MC9 | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 9 | 3 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 144 | 48 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 850 MHz | 900 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 800.2 GFLOPS | 86.4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 6 / 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 / 256 GB | 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | - | Up to 256 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 64 MP, f/1,8, 26mm, 8 MP, f/2,3, 16mm, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
21 MP, f/1,8 |
||||||
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/480fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 16 MP, f/2,5, 26mm |
8 MP |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 4.1, A2DP | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 10,300 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 13 hours and 30 minutes | ~ 19 hours | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 688,914 | 165,368 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 10,664 | 4,833 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 4,446 | 1,470 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 12,762 | 5,451 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 943 | 273 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 3,154 | 1,368 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Realme GT Neo is greater. The Realme GT Neo has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Realme GT Neo |
688,914 |
| Ulefone Armor 3WT |
165,368 |
The difference is 317%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Realme GT Neo |
10,664 |
| Ulefone Armor 3WT |
4,833 |
The difference in performance is 121%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Realme GT Neo |
4,446 12,762 |
| Ulefone Armor 3WT |
1,470 5,451 |
In single core, the difference is 202%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 134%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Realme GT Neo |
943 3,154 |
| Ulefone Armor 3WT |
273 1,368 |
In single core, the difference is 245%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 131%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Realme GT Neo 2Realme GT Neo 2TRealme GT Neo 3Realme GT Neo 3TRealme GT Neo 3T Dragon Ball ZRealme GT Neo 5Realme GT Neo 5 240WUlefone Armor 3W
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.