FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Realme C55 vs Samsung Galaxy Note5
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Realme C55 on one side and the Samsung Galaxy Note5 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.1GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Realme C55 | Samsung Galaxy Note5 | ||||||
| Model version(s) | RMX3710 |
SM-N920, SM-N9200, SM-N920A, SM-N920F, SM-N920G, SM-N920I, SM-N920K, SM-N920L, SM-N920S, SM-N920T |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2023 | Q3 2015 | ||||||
| Network | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,52 x 2,99 x 0,31 in | 6,03 x 3,00 x 0,30 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.70 oz | 6.03 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, plastic body |
Front and back glass, aluminum frame |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.7 inches, 680 nits, 16M colours | 5.7 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 16:9 | ||||||
| Density | 392 ppi | 518 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 13; Realme UI 4.0 | Android 5.1.1 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6769H Helio G88 | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm FFC | 14 nm LPE | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.5 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.0 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 2.1 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G57 MP1 | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 1 | 8 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 16 | 128 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 772 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 121.6 GFLOPS | 210 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 6 / 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 / 256 GB | 32 / 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 256 GB | - | ||||||
| Photo | 64 MP, 2 MP, |
16 MP, f/1,9, 28mm |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 8 MP |
5 MP, f/1,9, 22mm |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
1440p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 3,000 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 15 hours | ~ 13 hours and 50 minutes | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| DxOMark | - | 86 | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 256,298 | 136,813 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy Note5 is larger. The Realme C55 has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Realme C55 |
256,298 |
| Samsung Galaxy Note5 |
136,813 |
The difference is 87%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
See also:
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 ExynosSamsung Galaxy Note 3 NeoSamsung Galaxy Note 3 SD800Samsung Galaxy Note 4 ExynosSamsung Galaxy Note 4 SD805Samsung Galaxy Note EdgeSamsung Galaxy Note FE ExynosSamsung Galaxy Note FE SD820Samsung Galaxy Note IISamsung Galaxy Note N7000Samsung Galaxy Note10 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy Note10 5G SD855Samsung Galaxy Note10 ExynosSamsung Galaxy Note10 LiteSamsung Galaxy Note10 SD855Samsung Galaxy Note10+ 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy Note10+ 5G SD855Samsung Galaxy Note10+ ExynosSamsung Galaxy Note10+ SD855Samsung Galaxy Note20 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy Note20 5G SD865+Samsung Galaxy Note20 ExynosSamsung Galaxy Note20 SD865+Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G SD865+Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra ExynosSamsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra SD865+Samsung Galaxy Note7 ExynosSamsung Galaxy Note7 SD820Samsung Galaxy Note8 ExynosSamsung Galaxy Note8 SD835Samsung Galaxy Note9 ExynosSamsung Galaxy Note9 SD845Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.