FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Realme C55 vs Motorola Moto E32s
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Realme C55 on one side and the Motorola Moto E32s on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.3GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Realme C55 | Motorola Moto E32s | ||||||
| Model version(s) | RMX3710 |
Moto E32(s), XT2229-1, XT2229-2 |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2023 | Q2 2022 | ||||||
| Network | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,52 x 2,99 x 0,31 in | 6,46 x 2,95 x 0,33 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.70 oz | 6.53 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, plastic body |
Front glass, plastic body |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.7 inches, 680 nits, 16M colours | 6.5 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 720 x 1600 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 | ||||||
| Density | 392 ppi | 270 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 13; Realme UI 4.0 | Android 11 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6769H Helio G88 | MediaTek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm FFC | 12 nm FFC | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.8 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.0 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.3 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G57 MP1 | Imagination PowerVR GE8320 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 16 | 64 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 680 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 121.6 GFLOPS | 41.6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 6 / 8 GB RAM | 3 / 4 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 / 256 GB | 32 / 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 256 GB | Up to 1,024 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 64 MP, 2 MP, |
16 MP, f/2,2, 26mm, 2 MP, f/2,4, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 8 MP |
8 MP, f/2,0 |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 15 hours | ~ 16 hours and 10 minutes | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 256,298 | 118,726 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 377 | 167 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 1,413 | 887 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Motorola Moto E32s is larger. The Realme C55 has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Realme C55 |
256,298 |
| Motorola Moto E32s |
118,726 |
The difference is 116%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Realme C55 |
377 1,413 |
| Motorola Moto E32s |
167 887 |
In single core, the difference is 126%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 59%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Motorola Moto E32Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.