Oppo Reno8 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek)

Oppo Reno8 5G on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek) on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno8 5G on one side and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek) on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 10 cores, 10 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno8 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek)
Model version(s)

PGBM10

2016050
Release dateQ3 2022 Q3 2016
Network5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,32 x 2,89 x 0,30 in 5,94 x 2,99 x 0,33 in
Weight6.31 oz 6.17 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
plastic frame
Front glass,
aluminum body
Screen size, colours6.4 inches, 430 nits, 16M colours 5.5 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeAMOLED, 90Hz IPS LCD
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 1920 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 16:9
Density411 ppi 401 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 12; ColorOS 12.1 Android 6; MIUI 10
ProcessorMediaTek MT6893Z_Z/CZA Dimensity 1300 MediaTek MT6797M Helio X20
Lithography6 nm N6 20 nm HPM
Cores8 10
Threads8 10
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz
High performance cores

1x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 3.0 GHz,
3x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 2.6 GHz

2x ARM Cortex-A72 @ 2.0 GHz
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.85 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G77 MC9 ARM Mali-T880 MP4
GPU execution units9 4
GPU shading units144 64
GPU clock850 MHz 780 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point800.2 GFLOPS 136 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 2 / 4 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 16 / 64 GB
Memory card- Up to 256 GB
Photo

50 MP, f/1,8, 23mm,
2 MP, f/2,2, 16mm,
2 MP, f/2,4

13 MP, f/2,0
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps

1080p@30fps,
720p@120fps
Front photo

32 MP, f/2,4, 23mm

5 MP, f/2,0
Front video

1080p@30fps

720p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, Galileo, BDS,
QZSS, NavIC

GPS, A-GPS, Glonass, Beidou
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity4,500 mAh 4,100 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 15 hours ~ 9 hours and 20 minutes
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu685,052 100,777
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
4,076 1,341
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
13,372 3,610
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek) has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno8 5G is greater. The Oppo Reno8 5G has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Oppo Reno8 5G 685,052
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek) 100,777


The difference is 580%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno8 5G 4,076
13,372
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek) 1,341
3,610


In single core, the difference is 204%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 270%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.






GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.