Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G vs Motorola One Vision

Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G on Amazon USA
Motorola One Vision on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G on one side and the Motorola One Vision on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G Motorola One Vision
Model version(s)

PDRM00, PDRT00

XT1970-1
Release dateQ1 2021 Q2 2019
Network5G, EVDO, CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,30 x 2,85 x 0,31 in 6,30 x 2,80 x 0,34 in
Weight6.49 oz 6.35 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic frame
Screen size, colours6.6 inches, 800 nits, 16M colours 6.3 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeAMOLED, 90Hz LTPS IPS LCD
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2520 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 21:9
Density402 ppi 432 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 11; ColorOS 11.1 Android 9
ProcessorQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609
Lithography7 nm N7P 10 nm LPE
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.6 GHz
High performance cores

1x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Prime @ 2.84 GHz
3x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Gold @ 2.42 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.2 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 650 ARM Mali-G72 MP3
GPU execution units2 3
GPU shading units512 48
GPU base clock587 MHz -
GPU boost clock587 MHz 900 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point1,250 GFLOPS 86.4 GFLOPS
Memory8 / 12 GB RAM 4 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 128 GB
Memory card- Up to 1 TB
Photo

50 MP, f/1,8,
13 MP, f/2,4,
16 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4

48 MP, f/1,7,
5 MP, f/2,2
Video

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/240fps

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60fps
Front photo

32 MP, f/2,4, 26mm

25 MP, f/2,0
Front video

1080p@30fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 3.1 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity4,500 mAh 3,500 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 16 hours ~ 11 hours and 50 minutes
TDP- 6 W
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu661,618 190,206
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
4,229 1,548
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
12,471 5,050
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G is greater. The Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G 661,618
Motorola One Vision 190,206


The difference is 248%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G 4,229
12,471
Motorola One Vision 1,548
5,050


In single core, the difference is 173%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 147%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.






GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.