Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)

Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G on one side and the Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.6GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.3GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno5 Pro 5G Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)
Model version(s)

CPH2201, PDSM00, PDST00

SM-J120A, SM-J120AZ, SM-J120G,
SM-J120F, SM-J120FN, SM-J120H,
SM-J120M, SM-J120T, SM-J120W,
SM-J120ZN
Release dateQ1 2021 Q1 2016
Network5G, CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,29 x 2,88 x 0,30 in 5,22 x 2,73 x 0,35 in
Weight6.10 oz 4.62 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours6.6 inches, 600 nits, 16M colours 4.5 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeSuper AMOLED, 90Hz Super AMOLED
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 480 x 800 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 5:3
Density402 ppi 207 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 11; ColorOS 11.1 Android 5.1.1 (Lollipop)
ProcessorMediaTek MT6889Z Dimensity 1000+ Unisoc SC9830
Lithography7 nm N7 28 nm HPM
Cores8 4
Threads8 4
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz

-
High performance cores

4x ARM Cortex-A77 @ 2.6 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A7 @ 1.3 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G77 MC9 ARM Mali-400 MP2
GPU execution units9 2
GPU shading units144 32
GPU base clock850 MHz 200 MHz
GPU boost clock850 MHz 600 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point800.2 GFLOPS 10.8 GFLOPS
Memory8 / 12 GB RAM 1 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 8 GB
Memory card- Up to 128 GB
Photo

64 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

5 MP, f/2,2
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps

720p@30fps
Front photo

32 MP, f/2,4, 26mm

2 MP, f/2,2
Front video

1080p@30fps

-
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 4.1, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, Galileo, BDS, QZSS

GPS, Glonass
USBUSB Type-C 3.1 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity4,350 mAh 2,050 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use)~ 16 hours and 30 minutes ~ 8 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu518,069 14,211
Android PassMark Rating9,351 693
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,550 414
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
12,477 1,238
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
722 70
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
2,856 136
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G has more cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G is greater. The Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G 518,069
Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) 14,211


The difference is 3546%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G 9,351
Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) 693


The difference in performance is 1249%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G 3,550
12,477
Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) 414
1,238


In single core, the difference is 757%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 908%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G 722
2,856
Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) 70
136


In single core, the difference is 931%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 2000%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.






GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.