Oppo Reno5 A 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X4 GT

Oppo Reno5 A 5G on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno5 A 5G on one side and the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.4GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.9GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno5 A 5G Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Model version(s)

A103OP

22041216G
Release dateQ1 2021 Q2 2022
Network5G, CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,38 x 2,94 x 0,32 in 6,44 x 2,93 x 0,35 in
Weight6.42 oz 7.05 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic back
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 16M colours 6.6 inches, 500 nits, 16M colours
Screen typeAMOLED, 90Hz IPS LCD, 144Hz
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2460 pixels
Screen ratio2.2:1 20.5:9
Density405 ppi 407 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 11; ColorOS 11.1 Android 12; MIUI 13
ProcessorQualcomm SM7250-AB Snapdragon 765G 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8100
Lithography7 nm LPP EUV 5 nm N5
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz
High performance cores

1x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.4 GHz
1x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.85 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 620 ARM Mali-G610 MC6
GPU execution units3 6
GPU shading units192 96
GPU clock750 MHz 600 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point- 916 GFLOPS
Memory6 GB RAM 8 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 128 / 256 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB -
Photo

64 MP, f/1,7,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

64 MP, f/1,9,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60fps
Front photo

16 MP, f/2,0

16 MP, f/2,5
Front video

1080p@30fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 5.3, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, Galileo, BDS, QZSS

GPS, Glonass, Galileo, BDS,
QZSS, NavIC
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity4,000 mAh 5,080 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 16 hours ~ 12 hours and 10 minutes
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu327,045 754,488
Android PassMark Rating6,976 15,743
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,841 4,276
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
7,413 15,403
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
609 925
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,772 3,675
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Poco X4 GT is larger. The Xiaomi Poco X4 GT was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT 754,488
Oppo Reno5 A 5G 327,045


The difference is 131%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT 15,743
Oppo Reno5 A 5G 6,976


The difference in performance is 126%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT 4,276
15,403
Oppo Reno5 A 5G 2,841
7,413


In single core, the difference is 51%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 108%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT 925
3,675
Oppo Reno5 A 5G 609
1,772


In single core, the difference is 52%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 107%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.






GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.