Oppo Reno5 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S

Oppo Reno5 4G on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno5 4G on one side and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.1GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno5 4G Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S
Model version(s)

CPH2159

2201117SG, 2201117SI,
2201117SL, 2201117SY
Release dateQ1 2021 Q1 2022
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,26 x 2,89 x 0,30 in 6,30 x 2,91 x 0,32 in
Weight6.03 oz 6.31 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic frame
Screen size, colours6.4 inches, 600 nits, 16M colours 6.4 inches, 700 nits, 16M colours
Screen typeAMOLED, 90Hz AMOLED, 90Hz
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density409 ppi 409 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 11; ColorOS 11.1 Android 11; MIUI 13
ProcessorQualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G MediaTek MT6781 Helio G96
Lithography8 nm LPP 12 nm FFC
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

6x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz
High performance cores

2x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Gold @ 2.3 GHz

2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.05 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 618 ARM Mali-G57 MC2
GPU execution units2 2
GPU shading units128 32
GPU base clock750 MHz -
GPU boost clock750 MHz 850 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point422.4 GFLOPS 243.2 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 6 / 8 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 64 / 128 GB
Memory cardUp to 512 GB Up to 1 TB
Photo

64 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

108 MP, f/1,9, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps

1080p@30fps
Front photo

44 MP, f/2,4, 24mm

16 MP, f/2,5
Front video

1080p@30/120fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity4,310 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 14 hours ~ 15 hours and 20 minutes
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu285,927 270,155
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,650 2,556
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
6,842 7,688
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
557 527
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,637 1,829
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno5 4G is greater. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Oppo Reno5 4G 285,927
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 270,155


The difference is 6%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 2,556
7,688
Oppo Reno5 4G 2,650
6,842


In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 12%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 527
1,829
Oppo Reno5 4G 557
1,637


In single core, the difference is 6%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 12%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 SEXiaomi Redmi Note 11EXiaomi Redmi Note 11E ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11RXiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11T 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11T ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.