Oppo Reno5 4G vs Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G

Oppo Reno5 4G on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno5 4G on one side and the Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno5 4G Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G
Model version(s)

CPH2159

M2103K19PG, M2103K19PI, M2103K19PY
Release dateQ1 2021 Q2 2021
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,26 x 2,89 x 0,30 in 6,37 x 2,96 x 0,35 in
Weight6.03 oz 6.70 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours6.4 inches, 600 nits, 16M colours 6.5 inches, 400 nits, 16M colours
Screen typeAMOLED, 90Hz IPS LCD, 90Hz
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density409 ppi 405 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 11; ColorOS 11.1 Android 11; MIUI 12
ProcessorQualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G MediaTek MT6833 Dimensity 700 5G
Lithography8 nm LPP 7 nm N7
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

6x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz
High performance cores

2x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Gold @ 2.3 GHz

2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 618 ARM Mali-G57 MC2
GPU execution units2 2
GPU shading units128 32
GPU clock750 MHz 950 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point422.4 GFLOPS 243.2 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 4 / 6 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 64 / 128 GB
Memory cardUp to 512 GB Up to 512 GB
Photo

64 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

48 MP, f/1,8, 26mm,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps

1080p@30fps
Front photo

44 MP, f/2,4, 24mm

8 MP, f/2,0
Front video

1080p@30/120fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 5.1, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity4,310 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 14 hours ~ 16 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu285,927 324,873
Android PassMark Rating6,425 6,628
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,650 2,685
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
6,842 6,952
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
557 538
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,637 1,747
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno5 4G is greater. They were produced the same year.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G 324,873
Oppo Reno5 4G 285,927


The difference is 14%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G 6,628
Oppo Reno5 4G 6,425


The difference in performance is 3%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G 2,685
6,952
Oppo Reno5 4G 2,650
6,842


In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 2%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5G 538
1,747
Oppo Reno5 4G 557
1,637


In single core, the difference is 4%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 7%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.






GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.