Oppo Reno5 4G vs Xiaomi Mi Max 2

Oppo Reno5 4G on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno5 4G on one side and the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno5 4G Xiaomi Mi Max 2
Model version(s)

CPH2159

MDE40, MDI40
Release dateQ1 2021 Q2 2017
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,26 x 2,89 x 0,30 in 6,85 x 3,49 x 0,30 in
Weight6.03 oz 7.44 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
aluminum body
Screen size, colours6.4 inches, 600 nits, 16M colours 6.4 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeAMOLED, 90Hz IPS LCD
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 1920 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 16:9
Density409 ppi 342 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 11; ColorOS 11.1 Android 7.1.1; MIUI 11
ProcessorQualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625
Lithography8 nm LPP 14 nm LPP
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

6x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

-
High performance cores

2x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Gold @ 2.3 GHz

8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 618 Qualcomm Adreno 506
GPU execution units2 1
GPU shading units128 96
GPU clock750 MHz 650 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point422.4 GFLOPS 124.8 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 4 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 32 / 128 GB
Memory cardUp to 512 GB Up to 128 GB
Photo

64 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

12 MP, f/2,2
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps

4K@30fps,
720p@120fps
Front photo

44 MP, f/2,4, 24mm

5 MP, f/2,0
Front video

1080p@30/120fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C
Battery capacity4,310 mAh 5,300 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use)~ 14 hours ~ 12 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu285,927 78,119
Android PassMark Rating6,425 3,111
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,650 844
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
6,842 3,774
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
557 171
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,637 1,013
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno5 4G is greater. The Oppo Reno5 4G has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Oppo Reno5 4G 285,927
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 78,119


The difference is 266%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Oppo Reno5 4G 6,425
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 3,111


The difference in performance is 107%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno5 4G 2,650
6,842
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 844
3,774


In single core, the difference is 214%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 81%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno5 4G 557
1,637
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 171
1,013


In single core, the difference is 226%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 62%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Xiaomi Mi Max 3Xiaomi Mi Max Prime




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.