Oppo Reno5 4G vs Xiaomi Mi 9

Oppo Reno5 4G on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Mi 9 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno5 4G on one side and the Xiaomi Mi 9 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno5 4G Xiaomi Mi 9
Model version(s)

CPH2159

Xiaomi Cepheus
Release dateQ1 2021 Q1 2019
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,26 x 2,89 x 0,30 in 6,20 x 2,94 x 0,30 in
Weight6.03 oz 6.10 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.4 inches, 600 nits, 16M colours 6.4 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeAMOLED, 90Hz Super AMOLED
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 19.5:9
Density409 ppi 403 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 11; ColorOS 11.1 Android 9
ProcessorQualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855
Lithography8 nm LPP 7 nm N7
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

6x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

4x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Silver @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

2x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Gold @ 2.3 GHz

1x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Gold Prime @ 2.84 GHz
3x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Gold @ 2.42 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 618 Qualcomm Adreno 640
GPU execution units2 2
GPU shading units128 384
GPU clock750 MHz 585 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point422.4 GFLOPS 954.7 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 6 / 8 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 64 / 128 GB
Memory cardUp to 512 GB -
Photo

64 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

48 MP, f/1,8
16 MP, f/2,2, 13mm
12 MP, f/2,2, 54mm
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/120/240/960fps
Front photo

44 MP, f/2,4, 24mm

20 MP, f/2,0, 0,9µm
Front video

1080p@30/120fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity4,310 mAh 3,300 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 14 hours ~ 15 hours and 50 minutes
TDP- 10 W
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
DxOMark- 110
AnTuTu285,927 440,122
Android PassMark Rating6,425 9,276
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,650 3,512
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
6,842 10,783
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Mi 9 is larger. The Oppo Reno5 4G has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 440,122
Oppo Reno5 4G 285,927


The difference is 54%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Xiaomi Mi 9 9,276
Oppo Reno5 4G 6,425


The difference in performance is 44%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Mi 9 3,512
10,783
Oppo Reno5 4G 2,650
6,842


In single core, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 58%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.



See also:

Xiaomi Mi 10 5GXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GXiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5GXiaomi Mi 10 UltraXiaomi Mi 10 Youth 5GXiaomi Mi 10i 5GXiaomi Mi 10SXiaomi Mi 10T 5GXiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5GXiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5GXiaomi Mi 11Xiaomi Mi 11 LiteXiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5GXiaomi Mi 11 ProXiaomi Mi 11 UltraXiaomi Mi 11i 5GXiaomi Mi 11XXiaomi Mi 11X ProXiaomi Mi 3Xiaomi Mi 4Xiaomi Mi 4cXiaomi Mi 5Xiaomi Mi 5cXiaomi Mi 5sXiaomi Mi 5s PlusXiaomi Mi 5XXiaomi Mi 6Xiaomi Mi 6XXiaomi Mi 8Xiaomi Mi 8 LiteXiaomi Mi 8 ProXiaomi Mi 8 SEXiaomi Mi 9 LiteXiaomi Mi 9 ProXiaomi Mi 9 Pro 5GXiaomi Mi 9 SEXiaomi Mi 9TXiaomi Mi 9T ProXiaomi Mi A1Xiaomi Mi A2Xiaomi Mi A2 LiteXiaomi Mi A3Xiaomi Mi A4Xiaomi Mi CC9Xiaomi Mi CC9 ProXiaomi Mi CC9eXiaomi Mi MaxXiaomi Mi Max 2Xiaomi Mi Max 3Xiaomi Mi Max PrimeXiaomi Mi MixXiaomi Mi Mix 2Xiaomi Mi Mix 2SXiaomi Mi Mix 3Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 5GXiaomi Mi Mix AlphaXiaomi Mi NoteXiaomi Mi Note 10Xiaomi Mi Note 10 LiteXiaomi Mi Note 10 ProXiaomi Mi Note 2Xiaomi Mi Note 3Xiaomi Mi Note ProXiaomi Mi Play




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.