FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Oppo Reno5 4G vs Samsung Galaxy F22
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno5 4G on one side and the Samsung Galaxy F22 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Oppo Reno5 4G | Samsung Galaxy F22 | ||||||
| Model version(s) | CPH2159 |
SM-E225F, SM-E225F/DS |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2021 | Q3 2021 | ||||||
| Network | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,26 x 2,89 x 0,30 in | 6,30 x 2,91 x 0,37 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.03 oz | 7.16 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front and back glass, aluminum frame |
Front glass, plastic body |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.4 inches, 600 nits, 16M colours | 6.4 inches, 600 nits, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | AMOLED, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 90Hz | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 720 x 1600 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 | ||||||
| Density | 409 ppi | 274 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 11; ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11; One UI Core 3.1 | ||||||
| Processor | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | MediaTek MT6769V/CT Helio G80 | ||||||
| Lithography | 8 nm LPP | 12 nm FFC | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 6x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Silver @ 1.8 GHz |
6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 2x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Gold @ 2.3 GHz |
2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.0 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 618 | ARM Mali-G52 MC2 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 128 | 32 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | 950 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 435.2 GFLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 8 GB RAM | 4 / 6 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 GB | 64 / 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 512 GB | Up to 512 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 64 MP, f/1,7, 26mm, 8 MP, f/2,2, 2 MP, f/2,4, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
48 MP, f/1,8, 8 MP, f/2,2, 2 MP, f/2,4, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
||||||
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 44 MP, f/2,4, 24mm |
13 MP, f/2,2 |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30/120fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,310 mAh | 6,000 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 14 hours | ~ 29 hours and 40 minutes | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 285,927 | 163,863 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 557 | 358 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 1,637 | 1,313 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno5 4G is greater. They were produced the same year.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Oppo Reno5 4G |
285,927 |
| Samsung Galaxy F22 |
163,863 |
The difference is 74%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Oppo Reno5 4G |
557 1,637 |
| Samsung Galaxy F22 |
358 1,313 |
In single core, the difference is 56%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 25%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Samsung Galaxy F23Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.