Oppo Reno4 Z 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Y1

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Redmi Y1 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno4 Z 5G on one side and the Xiaomi Redmi Y1 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.4GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno4 Z 5G Xiaomi Redmi Y1
Model version(s)

Oppo CPH2065

MDI6S
Release dateQ4 2020 Q4 2017
Network5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,45 x 2,97 x 0,32 in 6,02 x 3,00 x 0,30 in
Weight6.49 oz 5.40 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic back,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.6 inches, 480 nits, 16M colours 5.5 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeLTPS IPS LCD, 120Hz IPS LCD
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 720 x 1280 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 16:9
Density401 ppi 267 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 10; ColorOS 7.2 Android 7.1.2; MIUI 11
ProcessorMediaTek MT6873 Dimensity 800 5G Qualcomm MSM8940 Snapdragon 435
Lithography7 nm N7 28 nm LP
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz

-
High performance cores

4x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.0 GHz

8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G57 MP4 Qualcomm Adreno 505
GPU execution units4 1
GPU shading units64 96
GPU boost clock850 MHz 450 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point486.4 GFLOPS 48.6 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 3 / 4 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 32 / 64 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB Up to 128 GB
Photo

48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

13 MP, f/2,2
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30fps

1080p@30fps
Front photo

16 MP, f/2,0, 26mm,
2 MP, f/2,4

16 MP, f/2,5
Front video

1080p@30fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, BDS

GPS, Glonass
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity4,000 mAh 3,080 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use)~ 8 hours ~ 9 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu325,766 45,862
Android PassMark Rating7,346 2,372
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,500 671
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
8,548 2,485
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
513 123
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
2,114 554
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno4 Z 5G is greater. The Oppo Reno4 Z 5G has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 325,766
Xiaomi Redmi Y1 45,862


The difference is 610%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 7,346
Xiaomi Redmi Y1 2,372


The difference in performance is 210%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 2,500
8,548
Xiaomi Redmi Y1 671
2,485


In single core, the difference is 273%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 244%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 513
2,114
Xiaomi Redmi Y1 123
554


In single core, the difference is 317%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 282%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Xiaomi Redmi Y2Xiaomi Redmi Y3




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.