Oppo Reno4 Z 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S7 Active

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno4 Z 5G on one side and the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno4 Z 5G Samsung Galaxy S7 Active
Model version(s)

Oppo CPH2065

SM-G891A
Release dateQ4 2020 Q2 2016
Network5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,45 x 2,97 x 0,32 in 5,86 x 2,95 x 0,39 in
Weight6.49 oz 6.53 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic back,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.6 inches, 480 nits, 16M colours 5.1 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeLTPS IPS LCD, 120Hz Super AMOLED
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1440 x 2560 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 16:9
Density401 ppi 576 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 10; ColorOS 7.2 Android 6; TouchWiz UI
ProcessorMediaTek MT6873 Dimensity 800 5G Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820
Lithography7 nm N7 14 nm
Cores8 4
Threads8 4
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz

2x Qualcomm Kryo @ 1.6 GHz
High performance cores

4x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.0 GHz

2x Qualcomm Kryo @ 2.15 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G57 MP4 Qualcomm Adreno 530
GPU execution units4 2
GPU shading units64 256
GPU base clock- 624 MHz
GPU boost clock850 MHz 624 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point486.4 GFLOPS 498.5 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 4 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 32 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB Up to 200 GB
Photo

48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

12 MP, f/1,7, 26mm
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30fps

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60fps,
720p@240fps
Front photo

16 MP, f/2,0, 26mm,
2 MP, f/2,4

5 MP, f/1,7, 22mm
Front video

1080p@30fps

1440p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, BDS

GPS, Glonass, BDS
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity4,000 mAh 4,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use)~ 8 hours ~ 11 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu325,766 244,653
Android PassMark Rating7,346 3,322
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,500 1,489
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
8,548 3,887
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
513 334
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
2,114 828
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Oppo Reno4 Z 5G has more cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is larger. The Oppo Reno4 Z 5G has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 325,766
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active 244,653


The difference is 33%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 7,346
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active 3,322


The difference in performance is 121%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 2,500
8,548
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active 1,489
3,887


In single core, the difference is 68%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 120%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 513
2,114
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active 334
828


In single core, the difference is 54%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 155%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.






GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.