Oppo Reno4 Z 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno4 Z 5G on one side and the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno4 Z 5G Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon
Model version(s)

Oppo CPH2065

SM-908E, SM-S908E/DS, SM-S908N,
SM-S908U, SM-S908U1, SM-S908W
Release dateQ4 2020 Q1 2022
Network5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE 5G, CDMA, GSM, EVDO, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,45 x 2,97 x 0,32 in 6,43 x 3,07 x 0,35 in
Weight6.49 oz 8.01 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic back,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.6 inches, 480 nits, 16M colours 6.8 inches, 1750 nits, 16M colours
Screen typeLTPS IPS LCD, 120Hz Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1440 x 3080 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density401 ppi 500 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 10; ColorOS 7.2 Android 12; One UI 4.1
ProcessorMediaTek MT6873 Dimensity 800 5G Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Lithography7 nm N7 4 nm 4LPE
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz

4x Qualcomm Kryo Silver @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

4x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.0 GHz

1x Qualcomm Kryo Prime @ 3.0 GHz,
3x Qualcomm Kryo Gold @ 2.5 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G57 MP4 Qualcomm Adreno 730
GPU execution units4 3
GPU shading units64 768
GPU base clock- 818 MHz
GPU boost clock850 MHz 818 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point486.4 GFLOPS 2,764.8 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 8 / 12 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 128 / 512 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB -
Photo

48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

108 MP, f/1,8, 24mm,
10 MP, f/4,9, 230mm,
10 MP, f/2,4, 70mm,
12 MP, f/2,2, 13mm
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30fps

8K@24fps,
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/240fps,
720p@960fps
Front photo

16 MP, f/2,0, 26mm,
2 MP, f/2,4

40 MP, f/2,2, 26mm
Front video

1080p@30fps

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 5.2, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, Beidou

GPS, Glonass, Galileo, Beidou, QZSS
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2
Battery capacity4,000 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use)~ 8 hours ~ 16 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu325,766 846,831
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,500 6,750
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
8,548 14,159
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
513 1,215
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
2,114 3,303
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon is larger. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon 846,831
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 325,766


The difference is 160%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon 6,750
14,159
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 2,500
8,548


In single core, the difference is 170%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 66%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Snapdragon 1,215
3,303
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 513
2,114


In single core, the difference is 137%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 56%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.






GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.