Oppo Reno4 Z 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S20 FE SD865

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE SD865 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno4 Z 5G on one side and the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE SD865 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno4 Z 5G Samsung Galaxy S20 FE SD865
Model version(s)

Oppo CPH2065

Galaxy S20 Fan Edition,
SM-G780G
Release dateQ4 2020 Q4 2020
Network5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,45 x 2,97 x 0,32 in 6,29 x 2,93 x 0,33 in
Weight6.49 oz 6.70 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic back,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.6 inches, 480 nits, 16M colours 6.5 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeLTPS IPS LCD, 120Hz Super AMOLED, 120Hz
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density401 ppi 407 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 10; ColorOS 7.2 Android 10; One UI 2.5
ProcessorMediaTek MT6873 Dimensity 800 5G Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G
Lithography7 nm N7 7 nm N7P
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz

4x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Silver @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

4x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.0 GHz

1x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Prime @ 2.84 GHz
3x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Gold @ 2.42 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G57 MP4 Qualcomm Adreno 650
GPU execution units4 2
GPU shading units64 512
GPU base clock- 587 MHz
GPU boost clock850 MHz 587 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point486.4 GFLOPS 1,250 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 6 / 8 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 128 / 256 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB Up to 1 TB
Photo

48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

12 MP, f/1,8, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,0, 73mm,
12 MP, f/2,2
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30fps

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/240fps
Front photo

16 MP, f/2,0, 26mm,
2 MP, f/2,4

32 MP, f/2,0, 26mm
Front video

1080p@30fps

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, Beidou

GPS, Glonass, Galileo, Beidou
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2
Battery capacity4,000 mAh 4,500 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 8 hours ~ 12 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu325,766 633,563
Android PassMark Rating7,346 12,171
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,500 4,044
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
8,548 11,552
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
513 887
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
2,114 3,130
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy S20 FE SD865 is larger. They were produced the same year.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE SD865 633,563
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 325,766


The difference is 94%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE SD865 12,171
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 7,346


The difference in performance is 66%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE SD865 4,044
11,552
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 2,500
8,548


In single core, the difference is 62%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 35%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE SD865 887
3,130
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G 513
2,114


In single core, the difference is 73%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 48%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.






GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.