Oppo Reno4 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact

Oppo Reno4 on Amazon USA
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno4 on one side and the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.






Specifications:


Smartphone Oppo Reno4 Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
Model version(s) Oppo CPH2113 707SH, SH-M09
Release date Q3 2020 Q1 2019
Network GSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 6,31 x 2,91 x 0,30 in 5,16 x 2,52 x 0,37 in
Weight 5.82 oz 4.76 oz
Body Front glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
plastic back,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours 6.4 inches, 430 nits, 16M colours 5.2 inches, 16M colours
Screen type AMOLED IGZO IPS LCD, 120Hz
Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2280 pixels
Screen ratio 20:9 19:9
Density 411 ppi 485 ppi
Operating system Android 10.0; ColorOS 7 Android 9.0
Processor Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845
Lithography 8 nm LPP 10 nm FinFET LPP
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Energy cores 6x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Silver @ 1.8 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.9 GHz
High performance cores 2x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Gold @ 2.3 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.8 GHz
GPU integrated graphics Qualcomm Adreno 618 Qualcomm Adreno 630
GPU execution units 2 2
GPU shading units 128 256
GPU clock 750 MHz 710 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 435.2 GFLOPS 737 GFLOPS
Memory 8 GB RAM 4 GB RAM
Storage 128 GB 64 GB
Memory card Up to 256 GB Up to 512 GB
Photo 48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4
22,6 MP, f/1,9, 22 mm
Video 2160p30,
1080p30
2160p30,
1080p30
Front photo 32 MP, f/2,4, 26mm 8 MP, f/2,2, 23 mm
Front video 1080p30 1080p30
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE 5.0, AD2P, LE
USB USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity 4,015 mAh 2,500 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 15 hours ~ 9 hours and 30 minutes
AnTuTu 268,727 254,957
Android PassMark Rating 6,733 6,806
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,666 2,274
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
7,034 7,961
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
563 166
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,715 1,861
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Sharp Aquos R2 Compact is larger. The Oppo Reno4 has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Oppo Reno4 268,727
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact 254,957


The difference is 5%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact 6,806
Oppo Reno4 6,733


The difference in performance is 1%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact 2,274
7,961
Oppo Reno4 2,666
7,034


In single core, the difference is 17%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 13%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

On Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact 166
1,861
Oppo Reno4 563
1,715


In single core, the difference is 239%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 9%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

See also:

Oppo RenoOppo Reno 10x ZoomOppo Reno ZOppo Reno2Oppo Reno2 FOppo Reno2 ZOppo Reno3Oppo Reno3 5GOppo Reno3 ProOppo Reno3 Pro 5GOppo Reno3 YouthOppo Reno4 5GOppo Reno4 FOppo Reno4 LiteOppo Reno4 ProOppo Reno4 Pro 5GOppo Reno4 Z 5GOppo Reno5 4GOppo Reno5 5GOppo Reno5 LiteOppo Reno5 Pro 5GOppo Reno5 Pro+ 5GOppo Reno6Oppo Reno6 5GOppo Reno6 Pro 5GOppo Reno6 Pro+ 5G




GadgetVersus.com © 2022 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland