Oppo Reno4 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco M2

Oppo Reno4 Pro on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Poco M2 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno4 Pro on one side and the Xiaomi Poco M2 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno4 Pro Xiaomi Poco M2
Model version(s)

Oppo CPH2109

M2004J19PI, MZB9919IN
Release dateQ3 2020 Q3 2020
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,31 x 2,88 x 0,30 in 6,43 x 3,03 x 0,36 in
Weight5.68 oz 6.98 oz
BodyFront glass,
plastic body
Front and back glass,
plastic frame
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 500 nits, 16M colours 6.5 inches, 400 nits, 16M colours
Screen typeSuper AMOLED, 90Hz IPS LCD
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 19.5:9
Density402 ppi 395 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 10; ColorOS 7 Android 10; MIUI 11
ProcessorQualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G MediaTek MT6769T Helio G80
Lithography8 nm LPP 12 nm FFC
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

6x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

2x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Gold @ 2.3 GHz

2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.0 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 618 ARM Mali-G52 MC2
GPU execution units2 2
GPU shading units128 32
GPU clock750 MHz 950 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point422.4 GFLOPS 81.6 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 6 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 64 / 128 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB Up to 512 GB
Photo

48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

13 MP, f/2,2, 28mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
5 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps

1080p@30fps
Front photo

32 MP, f/2,4, 26mm

8 MP, f/2,0, 27mm
Front video

1080p@30/120fps

1080p@30/120fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, Beidou, NavIC

GPS, Glonass, Beidou
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity4,000 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 16 hours ~ 17 hours
AnTuTu280,093 202,464
Android PassMark Rating6,728 5,515
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,658 1,811
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
7,106 6,036
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
563 361
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,698 1,299
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno4 Pro is greater. They were produced the same year.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Oppo Reno4 Pro 280,093
Xiaomi Poco M2 202,464


The difference is 38%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Oppo Reno4 Pro 6,728
Xiaomi Poco M2 5,515


The difference in performance is 22%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno4 Pro 2,658
7,106
Xiaomi Poco M2 1,811
6,036


In single core, the difference is 47%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 18%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno4 Pro 563
1,698
Xiaomi Poco M2 361
1,299


In single core, the difference is 56%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 31%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G

Xiaomi Poco M2 ProXiaomi Poco M3Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro 5GXiaomi Poco M4 5GXiaomi Poco M4 ProXiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5GXiaomi Poco M5Xiaomi Poco M5sXiaomi Poco M6 4GXiaomi Poco M6 5GXiaomi Poco M6 ProXiaomi Poco M6 Pro 5G




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.