Oppo Reno4 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F4

Oppo Reno4 Pro on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Poco F4 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno4 Pro on one side and the Xiaomi Poco F4 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno4 Pro Xiaomi Poco F4
Model version(s)

Oppo CPH2109

22021211RG
Release dateQ3 2020 Q2 2022
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,31 x 2,88 x 0,30 in 6,43 x 2,99 x 0,30 in
Weight5.68 oz 6.88 oz
BodyFront glass,
plastic body
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 500 nits, 16M colours 6.7 inches, 900 nits, 1B colours
Screen typeSuper AMOLED, 90Hz AMOLED, 120Hz
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density402 ppi 395 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 10; ColorOS 7 Android 12; MIUI 13
ProcessorQualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G
Lithography8 nm LPP 7 nm N7FF+
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

6x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

4x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Silver @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

2x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Gold @ 2.3 GHz

1x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Prime @ 3.2 GHz
3x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Gold @ 2.4 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 618 Qualcomm Adreno 650
GPU execution units2 2
GPU shading units128 512
GPU clock750 MHz 670 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point422.4 GFLOPS 1,372.1 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 6 / 12 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 128 / 256 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB -
Photo

48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

64 MP, f/1,8,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60fps
Front photo

32 MP, f/2,4, 26mm

20 MP, f/2,5
Front video

1080p@30/120fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 5.2, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, Beidou, NavIC

GPS, Glonass, Galileo, Beidou
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity4,000 mAh 4,500 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 16 hours ~ 12 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu280,093 684,667
Android PassMark Rating6,728 14,157
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,658 4,622
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
7,106 13,163
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
563 882
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,698 3,030
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Poco F4 is larger. The Xiaomi Poco F4 was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F4 684,667
Oppo Reno4 Pro 280,093


The difference is 144%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Xiaomi Poco F4 14,157
Oppo Reno4 Pro 6,728


The difference in performance is 110%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco F4 4,622
13,163
Oppo Reno4 Pro 2,658
7,106


In single core, the difference is 74%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 85%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco F4 882
3,030
Oppo Reno4 Pro 563
1,698


In single core, the difference is 57%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 78%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G

Xiaomi Poco F2 ProXiaomi Poco F3Xiaomi Poco F3 GTXiaomi Poco F4 GTXiaomi Poco F5Xiaomi Poco F5 ProXiaomi Poco F6Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.