Oppo Reno4 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT

Oppo Reno4 Pro on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno4 Pro on one side and the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno4 Pro Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Model version(s)

Oppo CPH2109

21121210G, 21121210I
Release dateQ3 2020 Q3 2021
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,31 x 2,88 x 0,30 in 6,40 x 3,02 x 0,33 in
Weight5.68 oz 7.41 oz
BodyFront glass,
plastic body
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 500 nits, 16M colours 6.7 inches, 800 nits, 1B colours
Screen typeSuper AMOLED, 90Hz AMOLED, 120Hz
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density402 ppi 395 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 10; ColorOS 7 Android 12; MIUI 13
ProcessorQualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Lithography8 nm LPP 4 nm 4LPE
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

6x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

4x Qualcomm Kryo Silver @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

2x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Gold @ 2.3 GHz

1x Qualcomm Kryo Prime @ 3.0 GHz,
3x Qualcomm Kryo Gold @ 2.5 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 618 Qualcomm Adreno 730
GPU execution units2 3
GPU shading units128 768
GPU clock750 MHz 818 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point422.4 GFLOPS 2,764.8 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 8 / 12 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 128 / 256 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB -
Photo

48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

64 MP, f/1,9, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps,
720p@960fps
Front photo

32 MP, f/2,4, 26mm

20 MP, f/2,4
Front video

1080p@30/120fps

1080p@30/60fps,
720p@120fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 5.2, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, BDS, NavIC

GPS, Glonass, Galileo, BDS, QZSS
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity4,000 mAh 4,700 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 16 hours ~ 11 hours and 10 minutes
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu280,093 968,376
Android PassMark Rating6,728 13,693
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,658 6,666
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
7,106 15,326
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
563 1,225
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,698 3,685
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is larger. The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 968,376
Oppo Reno4 Pro 280,093


The difference is 246%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 13,693
Oppo Reno4 Pro 6,728


The difference in performance is 104%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 6,666
15,326
Oppo Reno4 Pro 2,658
7,106


In single core, the difference is 151%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 116%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT 1,225
3,685
Oppo Reno4 Pro 563
1,698


In single core, the difference is 118%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 117%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.