Oppo Reno4 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C50

Oppo Reno4 Pro on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Poco C50 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno4 Pro on one side and the Xiaomi Poco C50 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno4 Pro Xiaomi Poco C50
Model version(s)

Oppo CPH2109

220733SPH, 220733SPI, MZB0D3DIN
Release dateQ3 2020 Q1 2023
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,31 x 2,88 x 0,30 in 6,49 x 3,02 x 0,36 in
Weight5.68 oz 6.77 oz
BodyFront glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
aluminum frame,
plastic back
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 500 nits, 16M colours 6.5 inches, 400 nits, 16M colours
Screen typeSuper AMOLED, 90Hz IPS LCD
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 720 x 1600 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density402 ppi 269 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 10; ColorOS 7 Android 12 (Go edition)
ProcessorQualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G MediaTek MT6761 Helio A22
Lithography8 nm LPP 12 nm FinFET
Cores8 4
Threads8 4
Energy cores

6x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

-
High performance cores

2x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Gold @ 2.3 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 618 Imagination PowerVR GE8320
GPU execution units2 2
GPU shading units128 64
GPU clock750 MHz 660 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point422.4 GFLOPS 41.6 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 2 / 3 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 32 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB Up to 512 GB
Photo

48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

8 MP, f/2,0
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps

1080p@30fps
Front photo

32 MP, f/2,4, 26mm

5 MP, f/2,2
Front video

1080p@30/120fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, BDS, NavIC

GPS, A-GPS
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity4,000 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 16 hours ~ 15 hours
AnTuTu280,093 82,660
Android PassMark Rating6,728 1,073
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,658 793
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
7,106 2,316
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
563 140
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,698 504
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Oppo Reno4 Pro has more cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno4 Pro is greater. The Xiaomi Poco C50 was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Oppo Reno4 Pro 280,093
Xiaomi Poco C50 82,660


The difference is 239%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Oppo Reno4 Pro 6,728
Xiaomi Poco C50 1,073


The difference in performance is 527%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno4 Pro 2,658
7,106
Xiaomi Poco C50 793
2,316


In single core, the difference is 235%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 207%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno4 Pro 563
1,698
Xiaomi Poco C50 140
504


In single core, the difference is 302%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 237%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G

Xiaomi Poco C51Xiaomi Poco C55




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.