Oppo Reno4 Pro vs Google Pixel 8a

Oppo Reno4 Pro on Amazon USA
Google Pixel 8a on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno4 Pro on one side and the Google Pixel 8a on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 9 cores, 9 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.9GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno4 Pro Google Pixel 8a
Model version(s)

Oppo CPH2109

G576D, G6GPR, G8HHN, GKV4X
Release dateQ3 2020 Q2 2024
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,31 x 2,88 x 0,30 in 5,99 x 2,86 x 0,35 in
Weight5.68 oz 6.63 oz
BodyFront glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
aluminum frame,
plastic back
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 500 nits, 16M colours 6.1 inches, 2000 nits, 16M colours
Screen typeSuper AMOLED, 90Hz OLED, 120Hz
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density402 ppi 430 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 10; ColorOS 7 Android 14
ProcessorQualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G Google Tensor G3
Lithography8 nm LPP 4 nm LPP
Cores8 9
Threads8 9
Energy cores

6x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A510 @ 1.70 GHz
High performance cores

2x Qualcomm Kryo 465 Gold @ 2.3 GHz

1x ARM Cortex-X3 @ 2.91 GHz
4x ARM Cortex-A715 @ 2.37 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 618 ARM Immortalis-G715s MC10
GPU execution units2 10
GPU shading units128 211
GPU clock750 MHz 890 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point422.4 GFLOPS 3,264 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 8 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 128 / 256 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB -
Photo

48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

64 MP, f/1,9, 26mm,
13 MP, f/2,2
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
Front photo

32 MP, f/2,4, 26mm

13 MP, f/2,2, 20mm
Front video

1080p@30/120fps

4K@30fps,
1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 5.3, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, BDS, NavIC

GPS, Glonass, Galileo, QZSS
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2
Battery capacity4,000 mAh 4,492 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 16 hours ~ 24 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu280,093 1,010,358
Android PassMark Rating6,728 15,591
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,658 6,336
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
7,106 13,832
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
563 1,271
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,698 3,507
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Google Pixel 8a has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Google Pixel 8a is larger. The Google Pixel 8a was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Google Pixel 8a 1,010,358
Oppo Reno4 Pro 280,093


The difference is 261%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Google Pixel 8a 15,591
Oppo Reno4 Pro 6,728


The difference in performance is 132%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Google Pixel 8a 6,336
13,832
Oppo Reno4 Pro 2,658
7,106


In single core, the difference is 138%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 95%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Google Pixel 8a 1,271
3,507
Oppo Reno4 Pro 563
1,698


In single core, the difference is 126%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 107%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Oppo Reno4 Pro 5G

Google Pixel 8Google Pixel 8 Pro




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.