Oppo Reno3 Youth vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Oppo Reno3 Youth on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno3 Youth on one side and the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.4GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno3 Youth Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Model version(s)

Oppo PCLM50

M2102K1G
Release dateQ1 2020 Q2 2021
Network5G, CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE 5G, CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,31 x 2,93 x 0,31 in 6,47 x 2,94 x 0,33 in
Weight6.35 oz 8.25 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
ceramic back,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.4 inches, 430 nits, 16M colours 6.8 inches, 900 nits, 1B colours
Screen typeAMOLED AMOLED, 120Hz
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1440 x 3200 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density411 ppi 515 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 10; ColorOS 7 Android 11; MIUI 12.5
ProcessorQualcomm SM7250-AB Snapdragon 765G 5G Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G
Lithography7 nm LPP EUV 5 nm (5LPE)
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz

4x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Silver @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

1x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.4 GHz
1x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz

1x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Prime @ 2.84 GHz
3x Qualcomm Kryo 680 Gold @ 2.42 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 620 Qualcomm Adreno 660
GPU execution units3 2
GPU shading units192 512
GPU clock750 MHz 840 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point- 1,720.3 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 8 / 12 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 256 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB -
Photo

48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
8 MP, f/2,2, 13mm,
2 MP B/W, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

50 MP, f/2,0, 24mm
48 MP, f/4,1, 120mm
48 MP, f/2,2, 12mm
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps

8K@24fps,
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60fps
Front photo

32 MP, f/2,0, 26mm

20 MP, f/2,2, 27mm
Front video

1080p@30fps

1080p@30/60fps,
720p@120fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE 5.2, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, Galileo, BDS, QZSS

GPS, Glonass, Galileo, BDS
USBUSB Type-C 3.1 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity4,025 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 12 hours ~ 15 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu321,002 698,732
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,864 4,038
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
7,736 13,465
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
618 1,048
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,904 3,395
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is larger. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra 698,732
Oppo Reno3 Youth 321,002


The difference is 118%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra 4,038
13,465
Oppo Reno3 Youth 2,864
7,736


In single core, the difference is 41%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 74%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra 1,048
3,395
Oppo Reno3 Youth 618
1,904


In single core, the difference is 70%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 78%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.






GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.