Oppo Reno Z vs Doogee N20 Pro

Oppo Reno Z on Amazon USA
Doogee N20 Pro on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno Z on one side and the Doogee N20 Pro on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.2GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.






Specifications:


Smartphone Oppo Reno Z Doogee N20 Pro
Model version(s) CPH1979, PCDM10 N20 Pro, Doogee N20Pro
Release date Q2 2019 Q3 2020
Network CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 6,19 x 2,95 x 0,36 in 6,25 x 3,03 x 0,34 in
Weight 6.56 oz 6.17 oz
Body Front and back glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours 6.4 inches, 16M colours 6.3 inches, 16M colours
Screen type AMOLED IPS LCD
Resolution 1080 x 2340 pixels 1080 x 2280 pixels
Screen ratio 19.5:9 19:9
Density 402 ppi 400 ppi
Operating system Android 9.0; ColorOS 6 Android 7.0
Processor MediaTek MT6779 Helio P90 MediaTek MT6771 Helio P60
Lithography 12 nm FinFET+ 12 nm HPM
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Energy cores 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz
High performance cores 2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.2 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.0 GHz
GPU integrated graphics Imagination PowerVR GM9446 ARM Mali-G72 MP3
GPU execution units 3 3
GPU shading units 12 48
GPU clock 970 MHz 800 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 128 GFLOPS 86.4 GFLOPS
Memory 4 / 8 GB RAM 6 GB RAM
Storage 128 / 256 GB 128 GB
Memory card - Up to 256 GB
Photo 48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
5 MP, f/2,4
16 MP, f/2,0
Video 2160p30,
1080p30/60/120
1080p30
Front photo 32 MP, f/2,0 16 MP, f/2,0
Front video 1080p30 720p30
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP
USB USB Type-C microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity 4,035 mAh 4,400 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 14 hours and 18 minutes ~ 13 hours
TDP 11 W -
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
AnTuTu 162,463 172,651
Android PassMark Rating 6,218 4,205
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
1,993 1,438
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
6,717 5,467
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno Z is greater. The Doogee N20 Pro was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Doogee N20 Pro 172,651
Oppo Reno Z 162,463


The difference is 6%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Oppo Reno Z 6,218
Doogee N20 Pro 4,205


The difference in performance is 48%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Oppo Reno Z 1,993
6,717
Doogee N20 Pro 1,438
5,467


In single core, the difference is 39%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 23%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

See also:

Oppo Reno 10x Zoom




GadgetVersus.com © 2021 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland