Oppo Reno Ace vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G Exynos

Oppo Reno Ace on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G Exynos on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Reno Ace on one side and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G Exynos on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.7GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo Reno Ace Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G Exynos
Model version(s)

PCLM10

SM-G988, SM-G988B,
SM-G988B/DS, SM-G988N
Release dateQ4 2019 Q1 2020
NetworkCDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE 5G, CDMA, GSM, EVDO, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,34 x 2,98 x 0,34 in 6,57 x 2,99 x 0,35 in
Weight7.05 oz 7.83 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 500 nits, 16M colours 6.9 inches, 1400 nits, 16M colours
Screen typeAMOLED, 90Hz Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1440 x 3200 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density402 ppi 511 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 9 (Pie); ColorOS 7 Android 10; One UI 2
ProcessorQualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 Samsung Exynos 990
Lithography7 nm N7 7 nm LPP
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.95 GHz
High performance cores

1x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Gold Prime @ 2.84 GHz
3x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Gold @ 2.42 GHz

2x Samsung Exynos M5 @ 2.73 GHz
2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.4 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 640 ARM Mali-G77 MP11
GPU execution units2 11
GPU shading units384 176
GPU clock585 MHz 800 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point954.7 GFLOPS 1,126 GFLOPS
Memory8 / 12 GB RAM 12 / 16 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 128 / 512 GB
Memory card- Up to 1 TB
Photo

48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
13 MP, f/2,4, 53mm,
8 MP, f/2,2, 13mm,
2 MP B/W, f/2,4

108 MP, f/1,8, 26mm,
Periscope 48 MP, f/3,5, 103mm,
12 MP, f/2,2, 13mm,
0,3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1,0
Video

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/120/240fps

8K@24fps,
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/120fps,
720p@960fps
Front photo

16 MP, f/2,0, 26mm

40 MP, f/2,2, 26mm
Front video

1080p@30fps

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, Galileo, BDS

GPS, Glonass, Galileo, BDS
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2
Battery capacity4,000 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 12 hours ~ 12 hours and 20 minutes
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu403,184 495,017
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
3,580 4,638
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
10,064 12,072
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
755 769
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
2,675 2,649
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno Ace is greater. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G Exynos was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G Exynos 495,017
Oppo Reno Ace 403,184


The difference is 23%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G Exynos 4,638
12,072
Oppo Reno Ace 3,580
10,064


In single core, the difference is 30%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 20%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno Ace 755
2,675
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G Exynos 769
2,649


In single core, the difference is -2%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Oppo Reno Ace 2 5G




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.