Oppo Find X7 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G

Oppo Find X7 Ultra on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Find X7 Ultra on one side and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.

Specification comparison:

SmartphoneOppo Find X7 Ultra Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Model version(s)


23129RAA4G, 23129RA5FL, 23124RA7EO
Release dateQ1 2024 Q1 2024
Dimensions6,47 x 3,00 x 0,37 in 6,39 x 2,98 x 0,31 in
Weight7.80 oz 6.67 oz
BodyFront and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic frame
Screen size, colours6.8 inches, 1600 nits, 1B colours 6.7 inches, 1800 nits, 1B colours
Screen typeLTPO AMOLED, 120Hz AMOLED, 120Hz
Resolution1440 x 3168 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen ratio19.8:9 20:9
Density510 ppi 395 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 14; ColorOS 14 Android 13; MIUI 14
ProcessorQualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm SM6225-AD Snapdragon 685 4G
Lithography4 nm N4P 6 nm N6
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

2x Qualcomm Kryo Silver @ 2.3 Ghz

4x Qualcomm Kryo 265 Silver @ 1.9 GHz
High performance cores

1x Qualcomm Kryo Prime @ 3.3 GHz,
5x Qualcomm Kryo Gold @ 3.2 Ghz

4x Qualcomm Kryo 265 Gold @ 2.8 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 750 Qualcomm Adreno 610
GPU execution units6 2
GPU shading units1,536 96
GPU base clock680 MHz -
GPU boost clock1000 MHz 600 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point5,548 GFLOPS 115.2 GFLOPS
Memory12 / 16 GB RAM 6 / 8 GB RAM
Storage256 / 512 GB 128 / 512 GB
Memory card- Up to 1 TB

50 MP, f/1,8, 23mm,
50 MP, f/2,6, 65mm,
50 MP, f/4,3, 135mm,
50 MP, f/2,0, 14mm

108 MP, f/1,8, 24mm,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4


Front photo

32 MP, f/2,4, 21mm

16 MP, f/2,4
Front video


WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7 Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE 5.1, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 3.2 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity5,000 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 12 hours and 50 minutes ~ 20 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu2,032,423 330,398
Geekbench 4 single core
8,852 2,059
Geekbench 4 multi-core
23,636 6,996
Geekbench 5 single core
1,584 433
Geekbench 5 multi-core
6,028 1,647
Geekbench 6 single core
2,170 477
Geekbench 6 multi-core
6,567 1,571

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Find X7 Ultra is greater. They were produced the same year.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.

AnTuTu - Total Score
Oppo Find X7 Ultra 2,032,423
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 330,398

The difference is 515%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Find X7 Ultra 8,852
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 2,059

In single core, the difference is 330%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 238%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Find X7 Ultra 1,584
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 433

In single core, the difference is 266%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 266%.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

With Android:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Find X7 Ultra 2,170
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 477

In single core, the difference is 355%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 318%.

Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.

GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.