FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Oppo Find X5 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F3
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Find X5 Pro on one side and the Xiaomi Poco F3 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.1GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Oppo Find X5 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F3 | ||||||
| Model version(s) | CPH2305, PFEM10, PFFM20 |
M2012K11AG |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2022 | Q1 2021 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, CDMA, CDMA2000, GSM, HSPA, LTE | 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,44 x 2,91 x 0,33 in | 6,44 x 3,01 x 0,31 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.88 oz | 6.91 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, ceramic back, aluminum frame |
Front and back glass, aluminum frame |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.7 inches, 500 nits, 1B colours | 6.7 inches, 1300 nits, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | LTPO2 AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz | ||||||
| Resolution | 1440 x 3216 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 | ||||||
| Density | 525 ppi | 395 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 11; ColorOS 11.2 | Android 11; MIUI 12 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6983 Dimensity 9000 | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G | ||||||
| Lithography | 4 nm N4 | 7 nm N7FF+ | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A510 @ 1.8 GHz |
4x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Silver @ 1.8 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 1x ARM Cortex-X2 @ 3.05 GHz, 3x ARM Cortex-A710 @ 2.85 GHz |
1x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Prime @ 3.2 GHz 3x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Gold @ 2.4 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G710 MC10 | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 10 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 160 | 512 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 850 MHz | 670 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 1,648 GFLOPS | 1,372.1 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 8 / 12 GB RAM | 6 / 8 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 256 / 512 GB | 128 / 256 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 50 MP, f/1,7, 25mm, 13 MP, f/2,4, 52mm, 50 MP, f/2,2, 15mm |
48 MP, f/1,8, 26mm, 8 MP, f/2,2, 5 MP, f/2,4, 50mm |
||||||
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 32 MP, f/2,4, 21mm |
20 MP, f/2,5 |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,520 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 11 hours and 30 minutes | ~ 13 hours | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 691,524 | 604,567 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 14,498 | 11,361 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 4,815 | 4,317 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 12,863 | 11,766 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 825 | 924 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 3,327 | 3,186 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Poco F3 is larger. The Oppo Find X5 Pro has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Oppo Find X5 Pro |
691,524 |
| Xiaomi Poco F3 |
604,567 |
The difference is 14%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Oppo Find X5 Pro |
14,498 |
| Xiaomi Poco F3 |
11,361 |
The difference in performance is 28%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Oppo Find X5 Pro |
4,815 12,863 |
| Xiaomi Poco F3 |
4,317 11,766 |
In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 9%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Oppo Find X5 Pro |
825 3,327 |
| Xiaomi Poco F3 |
924 3,186 |
In single core, the difference is -11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Xiaomi Poco F2 ProXiaomi Poco F3 GTXiaomi Poco F4Xiaomi Poco F4 GTDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.