Oppo Find X3 vs Samsung Galaxy Note Edge

Oppo Find X3 on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy Note Edge on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo Find X3 on one side and the Samsung Galaxy Note Edge on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.2GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.7GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.






Specifications:


Smartphone Oppo Find X3 Samsung Galaxy Note Edge
Model version(s) Oppo PEDM00 SM-N9150, SM-N915A, SM-N915D,
SM-N915F, SM-N915FY, SM-N915G,
SM-N915K, SM-N915L, SM-N915P,
SM-N915R4, SM-N915S, SM-N915T,
SM-N915V, SM-N915W8, SM-N915X
Release date Q1 2021 Q4 2014
Network 5G, CDMA, CDMA2000,
GSM, HSPA, LTE
GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 6,44 x 2,91 x 0,33 in 5,96 x 3,24 x 0,33 in
Weight 6.81 oz 6.14 oz
Body Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
plastic back,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours 6.7 inches, 500 nits, 1B colours 5.6 inches, 16M colours
Screen type LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz Super AMOLED
Resolution 1440 x 3216 pixels 1600 x 2560 pixels
Screen ratio 20:9 16:9
Density 525 ppi 524 ppi
Operating system Android 11.0; ColorOS 11.2 Android 4.4.4
Processor Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G Qualcomm APQ8084 Snapdragon 805
Lithography 7 nm N7FF+ 28 nm HPM
Cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Energy cores 4x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Silver @ 1.8 GHz -
High performance cores 1x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Prime @ 3.2 GHz
3x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Gold @ 2.4 GHz
4x Qualcomm Krait 450 @ 2.7 GHz
GPU integrated graphics Qualcomm Adreno 650 Qualcomm Adreno 420
GPU execution units 2 1
GPU shading units 512 128
GPU clock 670 MHz 600 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 1,372.1 GFLOPS 153.6 GFLOPS
Memory 8 GB RAM 3 GB RAM
Storage 128 / 256 GB 32 / 64 GB
Memory card - Up to 128 GB
Photo 50 MP, f/1,8, 26mm,
13 MP, f/2,4, 52mm,
50 MP, f/2,2, 16mm,
3 MP, f/3,0
16 MP, f/2,2, 31mm
Video 4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/240fps
4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60fps
Front photo 32 MP, f/2,4, 26mm 3,7 MP, f/1,9
Front video 1080p@30fps 1440p@30fps
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 5.2, A2DP, LE 4.1, A2DP, LE
USB USB Type-C 3.1 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity 4,500 mAh 3,000 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 13 hours and 30 minutes ~ 9 hours and 50 minutes
TDP - 12 W
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
AnTuTu 633,456 47,886
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
4,629 950
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
12,730 2,194
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Oppo Find X3 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Find X3 is greater. The Oppo Find X3 has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Oppo Find X3 633,456
Samsung Galaxy Note Edge 47,886


The difference is 1223%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Oppo Find X3 4,629
12,730
Samsung Galaxy Note Edge 950
2,194


In single core, the difference is 387%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 480%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

See also:

Oppo Find XOppo Find X2Oppo Find X2 LiteOppo Find X2 NeoOppo Find X2 ProOppo Find X3 LiteOppo Find X3 NeoOppo Find X3 ProOppo Find X5Oppo Find X5 LiteOppo Find X5 Pro




GadgetVersus.com © 2022 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland