Oppo F25 Pro 5G vs Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro

Oppo F25 Pro 5G on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo F25 Pro 5G on one side and the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.6GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.

Specification comparison:

SmartphoneOppo F25 Pro 5G Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
Model version(s)


Release dateQ1 2024 Q2 2023
Dimensions6,34 x 2,94 x 0,30 in 6,41 x 2,97 x 0,34 in
Weight6.24 oz 7.20 oz
BodyFront glass,
aluminum back,
plastic frame
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.7 inches, 500 nits, 1B colours 6.7 inches, 500 nits, 68B colours
Screen typeAMOLED, 120Hz AMOLED, 120Hz
Resolution1080 x 2412 pixels 1440 x 3200 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density394 ppi 526 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 14; ColorOS 14 Android 13; MIUI 14 for Poco
ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 7050 Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Lithography6 nm N6 4 nm N4
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz

4x Qualcomm Kryo Silver @ 2.0 GHz
High performance cores

2x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.6 GHz

1x Qualcomm Kryo Prime @ 3.2 GHz,
3x Qualcomm Kryo Gold @ 2.75 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G68 MC4 Qualcomm Adreno 730
GPU execution units4 3
GPU shading units64 768
GPU clock800 MHz 900 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point486.4 GFLOPS 2,764.8 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 8 / 12 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 256 / 512 GB
Memory cardUp to 2 TB -

64 MP, f/1,7, 25mm,
8 MP, f/2,2, 16mm,
2 MP, f/2,4

64 MP, f/1,8,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4


Front photo

32 MP, f/2,4, 22mm

16 MP, f/2,5
Front video


WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE 5.3, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity5,000 mAh 5,160 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 15 hours ~ 20 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu588,587 1,088,337
Geekbench 4 single core
3,693 6,833
Geekbench 4 multi-core
9,096 16,452
Geekbench 5 single core
699 1,267
Geekbench 5 multi-core
2,210 3,952
Geekbench 6 single core
913 1,309
Geekbench 6 multi-core
2,365 4,043

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is larger. The Oppo F25 Pro 5G has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.

AnTuTu - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 1,088,337
Oppo F25 Pro 5G 588,587

The difference is 85%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 6,833
Oppo F25 Pro 5G 3,693

In single core, the difference is 85%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 81%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 1,267
Oppo F25 Pro 5G 699

In single core, the difference is 81%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 79%.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

With Android:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 1,309
Oppo F25 Pro 5G 913

In single core, the difference is 43%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 71%.

Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.

GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.