FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G on one side and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.4GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | ||||||
| Model version(s) | CPH2213 |
M1901F7G, M1901F7H, M1901F7I |
||||||
| Release date | Q1 2021 | Q1 2019 | ||||||
| Network | 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,30 x 2,89 x 0,31 in | 6,27 x 2,96 x 0,32 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.10 oz | 6.56 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, aluminum back, plastic frame |
Front and back glass, plastic frame |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.4 inches, 430 nits, 16M colours | 6.3 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 | ||||||
| Density | 409 ppi | 409 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 11; ColorOS 12 | Android 9 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6853V Dimensity 800U 5G | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 | ||||||
| Lithography | 7 nm N7 | 14 nm LPP | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz |
4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Silver @ 1.84 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.4 GHz |
4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Gold @ 2.2 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G57 MC3 | Qualcomm Adreno 512 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 3 | 1 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 48 | 128 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | - | 650 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 850 MHz | 650 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 364.8 GFLOPS | 217.6 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 8 GB RAM | 3 / 6 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 GB | 32 / 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 512 GB | Up to 256 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 48 MP, f/1,7, 25mm, 8 MP, f/2,2, 16mm, 2 MP, f/2,4, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
48 MP, f/1,8, 5 MP, f/2,2 |
||||||
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
1080p@30/60/120fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 16 MP, f/2,4, 26mm |
13 MP, f/2,0 |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,310 mAh | 4,000 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 13 hours and 10 minutes | ~ 12 hours and 30 minutes | ||||||
| TDP | - | 9 W | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 308,137 | 144,161 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 5,918 | 5,091 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 2,863 | 1,615 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 7,066 | 5,327 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G is greater. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G |
308,137 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 |
144,161 |
The difference is 114%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G |
5,918 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 |
5,091 |
The difference in performance is 16%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G |
2,863 7,066 |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 |
1,615 5,327 |
In single core, the difference is 77%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 33%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
See also:
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10 LiteXiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro MaxXiaomi Redmi Note 10SXiaomi Redmi Note 10T 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11 SEXiaomi Redmi Note 11EXiaomi Redmi Note 11E ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11SXiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11T 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 11T ProXiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+Xiaomi Redmi Note 12Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 DiscoveryXiaomi Redmi Note 12 ExplorerXiaomi Redmi Note 12 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+Xiaomi Redmi Note 2Xiaomi Redmi Note 3Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)Xiaomi Redmi Note 4Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek)Xiaomi Redmi Note 4XXiaomi Redmi Note 5Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 5AXiaomi Redmi Note 6 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 7 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 7SXiaomi Redmi Note 8Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 2021Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 8TXiaomi Redmi Note 9Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 9 ProXiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro MaxXiaomi Redmi Note 9SXiaomi Redmi Note 9TDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.