Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek)

Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek) on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G on one side and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek) on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.4GHz. The second chips has a total of 10 cores, 10 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


Smartphone Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek)
Model version(s)

CPH2213

2016050
Release date Q1 2021 Q3 2016
Network 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 6,30 x 2,89 x 0,31 in 5,94 x 2,99 x 0,33 in
Weight 6.10 oz 6.17 oz
Body Front glass,
aluminum back,
plastic frame
Front glass,
aluminum body
Screen size, colours 6.4 inches, 430 nits, 16M colours 5.5 inches, 16M colours
Screen type Super AMOLED IPS LCD
Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 1920 pixels
Screen ratio 20:9 16:9
Density 409 ppi 401 ppi
Operating system Android 11; ColorOS 12 Android 6; MIUI 10
Processor MediaTek MT6853V Dimensity 800U 5G MediaTek MT6797M Helio X20
Lithography 7 nm N7 20 nm HPM
Cores 8 10
Threads 8 10
Energy cores

6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz
High performance cores

2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.4 GHz

2x ARM Cortex-A72 @ 2.0 GHz
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.85 GHz
GPU integrated graphics ARM Mali-G57 MC3 ARM Mali-T880 MP4
GPU execution units 3 4
GPU shading units 48 64
GPU base clock - 780 MHz
GPU boost clock 850 MHz 780 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 364.8 GFLOPS 136 GFLOPS
Memory 8 GB RAM 2 / 4 GB RAM
Storage 128 GB 16 / 64 GB
Memory card Up to 512 GB Up to 256 GB
Photo

48 MP, f/1,7, 25mm,
8 MP, f/2,2, 16mm,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

13 MP, f/2,0
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/120fps

1080p@30fps,
720p@120fps
Front photo

16 MP, f/2,4, 26mm

5 MP, f/2,0
Front video

1080p@30fps

720p@30fps
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 5.1, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP, LE
USB USB Type-C 2.0 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity 4,310 mAh 4,100 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 13 hours and 10 minutes ~ 9 hours and 20 minutes
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
AnTuTu 308,137 100,777
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
2,863 1,341
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
7,066 3,610
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek) has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G is greater. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total score
Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G 308,137
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek) 100,777


The difference is 206%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


On Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android
Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G 2,863
7,066
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (MediaTek) 1,341
3,610


In single core, the difference is 113%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 96%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.




GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland