Oppo A92 vs Xiaomi Poco C40

Oppo A92 on Amazon USA
Xiaomi Poco C40 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo A92 on one side and the Xiaomi Poco C40 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo A92 Xiaomi Poco C40
Model version(s)

CPH2059

220333QPG, 220333QPI
Release dateQ2 2020 Q2 2022
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,38 x 2,97 x 0,35 in 6,68 x 3,02 x 0,36 in
Weight6.77 oz 7.20 oz
BodyFront glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
aluminum frame,
plastic back
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 480 nits, 16M colours 6.7 inches, 400 nits, 16M colours
Screen typeIPS LCD IPS LCD
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 720 x 1650 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density405 ppi 268 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 10; ColorOS 7.1 Android 11; MIUI 13
ProcessorQualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 JLQ JR510
Lithography11 nm LPP 11 nm FinFET
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.5 GHz
High performance cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Gold @ 2.0 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 610 ARM Mali-G57 MC1
GPU execution units2 1
GPU shading units96 16
GPU boost clock600 MHz 850 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point115.2 GFLOPS 121.6 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 3 / 4 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 32 / 64 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB Up to 1 TB
Photo

48 MP, f/1,7,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP B/W, f/2,4

13 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/120fps

1080p@30fps
Front photo

16 MP, f/2,0

5 MP, f/2,2
Front video

1080p@30fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity5,000 mAh 6,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 9 hours and 10 minutes ~ 20 hours
TDP- 5 W
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu180,893 132,558
Android PassMark Rating5,122 2,412
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
1,499 957
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
5,493 2,783
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
305 163
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,274 886
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, they have an identical turbo frequency. The Xiaomi Poco C40 was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Oppo A92 180,893
Xiaomi Poco C40 132,558


The difference is 36%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Oppo A92 5,122
Xiaomi Poco C40 2,412


The difference in performance is 112%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo A92 1,499
5,493
Xiaomi Poco C40 957
2,783


In single core, the difference is 57%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 97%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo A92 305
1,274
Xiaomi Poco C40 163
886


In single core, the difference is 87%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 44%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Oppo A9Oppo A9 (2020)Oppo A91Oppo A92sOppo A93Oppo A93 5GOppo A94Oppo A94 5GOppo A95Oppo A95 5GOppo A96Oppo A96 5GOppo A97 5GOppo A98 5G




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.