Oppo A92 vs Sharp Aquos R3

Oppo A92 on Amazon USA
Sharp Aquos R3 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo A92 on one side and the Sharp Aquos R3 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo A92 Sharp Aquos R3
Model version(s)

CPH2059

808SH, SH-04L, SHV44
Release dateQ2 2020 Q2 2019
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,38 x 2,97 x 0,35 in 6,14 x 2,91 x 0,35 in
Weight6.77 oz 6.53 oz
BodyFront glass,
plastic body
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 480 nits, 16M colours 6.2 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeIPS LCD Pro IGZO IPS LCD
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1440 x 3120 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 19.5:9
Density405 ppi 554 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 10; ColorOS 7.1 Android 9 Pie
ProcessorQualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855
Lithography11 nm LPP 7 nm N7
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

4x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Silver @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Gold @ 2.0 GHz

1x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Gold Prime @ 2.84 GHz
3x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Gold @ 2.42 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 610 Qualcomm Adreno 640
GPU execution units2 2
GPU shading units96 384
GPU base clock- 585 MHz
GPU boost clock600 MHz 585 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point115.2 GFLOPS 954.7 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 6 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 128 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB Up to 512 GB
Photo

48 MP, f/1,7,
8 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP B/W, f/2,4

20 MP,
12 MP
Video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/120fps

4K@30fps
Front photo

16 MP, f/2,0

16,3 MP, f/2,0
Front video

1080p@30fps

1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE 5.0, AD2P, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1
Battery capacity5,000 mAh 3,200 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 9 hours and 10 minutes ~ 9 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu180,893 433,954
Android PassMark Rating5,122 8,432
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
1,499 3,426
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
5,493 10,036
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
305 728
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,274 2,394
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Sharp Aquos R3 is larger. The Oppo A92 has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Sharp Aquos R3 433,954
Oppo A92 180,893


The difference is 140%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Sharp Aquos R3 8,432
Oppo A92 5,122


The difference in performance is 65%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Sharp Aquos R3 3,426
10,036
Oppo A92 1,499
5,493


In single core, the difference is 129%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 83%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Sharp Aquos R3 728
2,394
Oppo A92 305
1,274


In single core, the difference is 139%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 88%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Oppo A9Oppo A9 (2020)Oppo A91Oppo A92sOppo A93Oppo A93 5GOppo A94Oppo A94 5GOppo A95Oppo A95 5GOppo A96Oppo A96 5GOppo A97 5GOppo A98 5G

Sharp Aquos R2Sharp Aquos R2 CompactSharp Aquos R5GSharp Aquos R6Sharp Aquos R7Sharp Aquos R7sSharp Aquos R8Sharp Aquos R8 ProSharp Aquos R8sSharp Aquos R8s Pro




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.