GadgetVersus Smartphone Processor


Oppo A9 (2020) vs Samsung Galaxy Note7 Exynos

Oppo A9 (2020) on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy Note7 Exynos on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo A9 (2020) on one side and the Samsung Galaxy Note7 Exynos on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.3GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.






Specifications:


Smartphone Oppo A9 (2020) Samsung Galaxy Note7 Exynos
Model version(s) CPH1937, CPH1939, CPH1941 SM-N930F, SM-N930S
Release date Q3 2019 Q3 2016
Network GSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 6,44 x 2,98 x 0,36 in 6,04 x 2,91 x 0,31 in
Weight 6.88 oz 5.96 oz
Body Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours 6.5 inches, 480 nits, 16M colours 5.7 inches, 16M colours
Screen type IPS LCD Super AMOLED
Resolution 720 x 1600 pixels 1440 x 2560 pixels
Screen ratio 20:9 16:9
Density 270 ppi 518 ppi
Operating system Android 9.0 Android 6.0.1
Processor Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890
Lithography 11 nm LPP 14 nm LPP
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Energy cores 4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Silver @ 1.8 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.6 GHz
High performance cores 4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Gold @ 2.0 GHz 4x Samsung Exynos M1 @ 2.3 GHz
GPU integrated graphics Qualcomm Adreno 610 ARM Mali-T880 MP12
GPU execution units 2 12
GPU shading units 96 192
GPU base clock rate - 650 MHz
GPU max clock rate 600 MHz 650 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 115.2 GFLOPS 265.2 GFLOPS
Memory 4 / 8 GB RAM 4 GB RAM
Storage 128 GB 64 GB
Memory card Up to 256 GB Up to 256 GB
Photo 48 MP, f/1,8,
8 MP, f/2,3, 13mm,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4
12 MP, f/1,7, 26mm
Video 2160p30,
1080p30
2160p30,
1080p60,
720p240
Front photo 16 MP, f/2,0, 26mm 5 MP, f/1,7, 22mm,
2 MP
Front video 1080p30 1080p30
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 5.0, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP, LE
USB microUSB 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1
Battery capacity 5,000 mAh 3,500 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 20 hours ~ 16 hours
TDP - 7 W
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
AnTuTu 132,900 134,220
Android PassMark Rating 5,030 1,730
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
1,513 1,356
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
5,425 4,538
Amazon
eBay




We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy Note7 Exynos is larger. The Oppo A9 (2020) has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Performances :


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Samsung Galaxy Note7 Exynos#ad 134,220
Oppo A9 (2020)#ad 132,900


The difference is 1%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
Oppo A9 (2020)#ad 5,030
Samsung Galaxy Note7 Exynos#ad 1,730


The difference in performance is 191%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Oppo A9 (2020) 1,513
5,425
Samsung Galaxy Note7 Exynos 1,356
4,538


In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 20%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.






GadgetVersus.com © 2020 - Privacy policy - Advertising policy

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland