FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Oppo A72 vs Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (MediaTek)
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo A72 on one side and the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (MediaTek) on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Oppo A72 | Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (MediaTek) | ||||||
| Model version(s) | CPH2067 |
SM-A146P, SM-A146P/N, SM-A146P/DS, SM-A146P/DSN, SM-A146U, SM-A146U1, SM-A146U1/DS, SM-A146W, SM-S146VL |
||||||
| Release date | Q2 2020 | Q1 2023 | ||||||
| Network | GSM, HSPA, LTE | 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,38 x 2,97 x 0,35 in | 6,60 x 3,07 x 0,36 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.77 oz | 7.13 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, plastic body |
Front glass, plastic body |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.5 inches, 480 nits, 16M colours | 6.6 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD, 90Hz | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2408 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 | ||||||
| Density | 405 ppi | 400 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 10; ColorOS 7.1 | Android 13; One UI Core 5 | ||||||
| Processor | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 | MediaTek MT6833V/NZA Dimensity 700 5G | ||||||
| Lithography | 11 nm LPP | 7 nm N7 | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Silver @ 1.8 GHz |
6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Gold @ 2.0 GHz |
2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | ARM Mali-G57 MC2 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 96 | 32 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | - | 950 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 600 MHz | 950 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 115.2 GFLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 4 / 8 GB RAM | 4 / 6 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 GB | 64 / 128 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 256 GB | Up to 1,024 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 48 MP, f/1,7, 8 MP, f/2,2, 2 MP, f/2,4, 2 MP B/W, f/2,4 |
50 MP, f/1,8, 2 MP, f/2,4, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
||||||
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 16 MP, f/2,0 |
13 MP, f/2,0 |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 10 hours | ~ 14 hours | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 174,943 | 275,767 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 4,428 | 9,217 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,486 | 2,531 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 5,276 | 6,888 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 307 | 530 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 1,254 | 1,725 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (MediaTek) is larger. The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (MediaTek) was started more recently.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (MediaTek) |
275,767 |
| Oppo A72 |
174,943 |
The difference is 58%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (MediaTek) |
9,217 |
| Oppo A72 |
4,428 |
The difference in performance is 108%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (MediaTek) |
2,531 6,888 |
| Oppo A72 |
1,486 5,276 |
In single core, the difference is 70%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 31%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (MediaTek) |
530 1,725 |
| Oppo A72 |
307 1,254 |
In single core, the difference is 73%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 38%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Oppo A7Oppo A71Oppo A71 (2018)Oppo A72 5GOppo A73Oppo A73 5GOppo A74Oppo A74 5GOppo A76Oppo A77 5GOppo A77sOppo A78 5GDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.