FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Oppo A53s vs Ulefone Armor X7
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo A53s on one side and the Ulefone Armor X7 on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Oppo A53s | Ulefone Armor X7 | ||||||
| Model version(s) | CPH2135 |
Armor X7 |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2020 | Q1 2020 | ||||||
| Network | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,45 x 2,96 x 0,33 in | 5,91 x 3,11 x 0,57 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.56 oz | 8.25 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, plastic body |
Front glass, plastic back, aluminum frame |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.5 inches, 16M colours | 5.0 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | ||||||
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 16:9 | ||||||
| Density | 270 ppi | 294 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 5.1; ColorOS 2.1 | Android 10 | ||||||
| Processor | Qualcomm SM4250-AA Snapdragon 460 | MediaTek MT6761V/WE Helio A20 | ||||||
| Lithography | 11 nm | 12 nm FFC | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 240 Silver @ 1.45 GHz |
- |
||||||
| High performance cores | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 240 Gold @ 1.8 GHz |
4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.8 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 96 | 128 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | - | 550 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 600 MHz | 550 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 115.2 GFLOPS | 20.8 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 128 GB | 16 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 256 GB | Up to 256 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 13 MP, f/2,2, 25mm, 2 MP, f/2,4, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
13 MP, f/2,2 |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 8 MP, f/2,0 |
5 MP, f/2,2 |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
720p@30fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,000 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 21 hours | ~ 13 hours | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 148,196 | 49,287 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 4,747 | 1,037 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,286 | 791 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 5,139 | 2,332 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 252 | 136 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 1,204 | 460 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Oppo A53s has more cores, they have an identical turbo frequency. They were produced the same year.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Oppo A53s |
148,196 |
| Ulefone Armor X7 |
49,287 |
The difference is 201%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Oppo A53s |
4,747 |
| Ulefone Armor X7 |
1,037 |
The difference in performance is 358%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Oppo A53s |
1,286 5,139 |
| Ulefone Armor X7 |
791 2,332 |
In single core, the difference is 63%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 120%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Oppo A53s |
252 1,204 |
| Ulefone Armor X7 |
136 460 |
In single core, the difference is 85%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 162%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Oppo A53Oppo A53 (2020)Oppo A53s 5GUlefone Armor XUlefone Armor X10Ulefone Armor X10 ProUlefone Armor X2Ulefone Armor X3Ulefone Armor X5Ulefone Armor X5 ProUlefone Armor X6Ulefone Armor X6 ProUlefone Armor X7 ProUlefone Armor X8Ulefone Armor X8iUlefone Armor X9Ulefone Armor X9 Pro
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.