Oppo A53s vs LG V50S ThinQ 5G

Oppo A53s on Amazon USA
LG V50S ThinQ 5G on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Oppo A53s on one side and the LG V50S ThinQ 5G on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.8GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneOppo A53s LG V50S ThinQ 5G
Model version(s)

CPH2135

LM-V510N
Release dateQ4 2020 Q4 2019
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE 5G, CDMA, EVDO, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,45 x 2,96 x 0,33 in 6,27 x 2,98 x 0,33 in
Weight6.56 oz 6.77 oz
BodyFront glass,
plastic body
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 16M colours 6.4 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeIPS LCD OLED
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 19.5:9
Density270 ppi 403 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 5.1; ColorOS 2.1 Android 9; LG UX 9
ProcessorQualcomm SM4250-AA Snapdragon 460 Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855
Lithography11 nm 7 nm N7
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo 240 Silver @ 1.45 GHz

4x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Silver @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo 240 Gold @ 1.8 GHz

1x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Gold Prime @ 2.84 GHz
3x Qualcomm Kryo 485 Gold @ 2.42 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 610 Qualcomm Adreno 640
GPU execution units2 2
GPU shading units96 384
GPU base clock- 585 MHz
GPU boost clock600 MHz 585 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point115.2 GFLOPS 954.7 GFLOPS
Memory4 GB RAM 8 GB RAM
Storage128 GB 256 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB Up to 1 TB
Photo

13 MP, f/2,2, 25mm,
2 MP, f/2,4,
2 MP, f/2,4

12 MP, f/1,8, 27mm,
13 MP, f/2,4, 9mm
Video

1080p@30fps

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/240fps
Front photo

8 MP, f/2,0

32 MP, f/1,9, 26mm
Front video

1080p@30fps

4K@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP 5.0, A2DP, LE
GNSS
GPS, Glonass, Galileo, BDS

GPS, Glonass, Galileo, BDS
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1
Battery capacity5,000 mAh 4,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 21 hours ~ 8 hours and 50 minutes
TDP- 10 W
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu148,196 433,936
Android PassMark Rating4,747 9,016
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
1,286 3,098
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
5,139 9,480
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
252 719
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,204 2,411
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of LG V50S ThinQ 5G is larger. The Oppo A53s has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
LG V50S ThinQ 5G 433,936
Oppo A53s 148,196


The difference is 193%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


Android PassMark Rating
LG V50S ThinQ 5G 9,016
Oppo A53s 4,747


The difference in performance is 90%.


PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
LG V50S ThinQ 5G 3,098
9,480
Oppo A53s 1,286
5,139


In single core, the difference is 141%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 84%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
LG V50S ThinQ 5G 719
2,411
Oppo A53s 252
1,204


In single core, the difference is 185%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 100%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



See also:

Oppo A53Oppo A53 (2020)Oppo A53s 5G




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.