Nokia G22 vs Oppo Reno11 5G

Nokia G22 on Amazon USA
Oppo Reno11 5G on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Nokia G22 on one side and the Oppo Reno11 5G on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.6GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.6GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.






Specification comparison:


SmartphoneNokia G22 Oppo Reno11 5G
Model version(s)

TA-1528

CPH2599
Release dateQ1 2023 Q1 2024
NetworkGSM, HSPA, LTE 5G, CDMA, GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions6,50 x 3,00 x 0,33 in 6,39 x 2,93 x 0,31 in
Weight6.91 oz 6.42 oz
BodyFront glass,
aluminum body
Front and back glass,
plastic frame
Screen size, colours6.5 inches, 500 nits, 16M colours 6.7 inches, 800 nits, 1B colours
Screen typeIPS LCD, 90Hz AMOLED, 120Hz
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels 1080 x 2412 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density270 ppi 394 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 12 Android 14; ColorOS 14
ProcessorUnisoc Tiger T606 MediaTek Dimensity 7050
Lithography12 nm FF 6 nm N6
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.6 GHz

6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz
High performance cores

2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 1.6 GHz

2x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.6 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G57 MP1 ARM Mali-G68 MC4
GPU execution units1 4
GPU shading units16 64
GPU clock650 MHz 800 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point121.6 GFLOPS 486.4 GFLOPS
Memory4 GB RAM 8 / 12 GB RAM
Storage64 / 128 GB 128 / 256 GB
Memory cardUp to 2 TB -
Photo

50 MP, f/1,8,
2 MP,
2 MP

50 MP, f/1,8, 26mm,
32 MP, f/2,0, 47mm,
8 MP, f/2,2, 16mm
Video

1080p@30fps

4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/120/480fps
Front photo

8 MP, f/2,0

32 MP, f/2,4, 22mm
Front video

1080p@30fps

4K@30fps,
1080p@30fps
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE 5.3, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity5,050 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 15 hours ~ 15 hours
AnTuTu195,638 487,926
(Android)
Geekbench 4 single core
1,484 3,671
(Android)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
4,998 9,324
(Android)
Geekbench 5 single core
307 829
(Android)
Geekbench 5 multi-core
1,304 2,298
(Android)
Geekbench 6 single core
369 963
(Android)
Geekbench 6 multi-core
1,362 2,417
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno11 5G is larger. The Oppo Reno11 5G was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.


AnTuTu - Total Score
Oppo Reno11 5G 487,926
Nokia G22 195,638


The difference is 149%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.




With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno11 5G 3,671
9,324
Nokia G22 1,484
4,998


In single core, the difference is 147%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 87%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno11 5G 829
2,298
Nokia G22 307
1,304


In single core, the difference is 170%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 76%.


Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.



With Android:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Oppo Reno11 5G 963
2,417
Nokia G22 369
1,362


In single core, the difference is 161%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 77%.


Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads.



See also:

Nokia G20Nokia G21




GadgetVersus.com © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.