Motorola One Power vs Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos

Motorola One Power on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Motorola One Power on one side and the Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.9GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.

Specification comparison:

SmartphoneMotorola One Power Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos
Model version(s)


SM-N960F, SM-N960N, SM-N960X
Release dateQ3 2018 Q4 2018
Dimensions6,14 x 2,99 x 0,33 in 6,37 x 3,01 x 0,35 in
Weight6.98 oz 7.09 oz
BodyFront glass,
aluminum back,
plastic frame
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours6.2 inches, 16M colours 6.4 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeIPS LCD Super AMOLED
Resolution1080 x 2246 pixels 1440 x 2960 pixels
Screen ratio18.7:9 18.5:9
Density403 ppi 516 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 8.1; Android One; ZUI 4 Android 8.1
ProcessorQualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 Samsung Exynos 9 Series 9810
Lithography14 nm LPP 10 nm LPE
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Silver @ 1.6 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.9 GHz
High performance cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Gold @ 1.8 GHz

4x Samsung Exynos M3 @ 2.9 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 509 ARM Mali-G72 MP18
GPU execution units1 18
GPU shading units128 288
GPU base clock- 572 MHz
GPU boost clock720 MHz 572 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point184.3 GFLOPS 370 GFLOPS
Memory3 / 6 GB RAM 6 / 8 GB RAM
Storage32 / 64 GB 128 / 512 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB Up to 512 GB

16 MP, f/1,8,
5 MP, f/2,2

12 MP, f/1,5-2,4, 26mm


Front photo

12 MP, f/2,0

12 MP, f/2,4, 52mm
Front video


WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1
Battery capacity5,000 mAh 4,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Ion Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use)~ 15 hours ~ 12 hours and 10 minutes
TDP- 8 W
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
DxOMark- 103
AnTuTu115,961 320,567
Android PassMark Rating4,155 5,739
Geekbench 4 single core
1,317 3,430
Geekbench 4 multi-core
4,764 8,657

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos is larger. They were produced the same year.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.

AnTuTu - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos 320,567
Motorola One Power 115,961

The difference is 176%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

Android PassMark Rating
Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos 5,739
Motorola One Power 4,155

The difference in performance is 38%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Samsung Galaxy Note9 Exynos 3,430
Motorola One Power 1,317

In single core, the difference is 160%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 82%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software. © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.