Motorola Moto Z2 Play vs Nokia G42 5G

Motorola Moto Z2 Play on Amazon USA
Nokia G42 5G on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Motorola Moto Z2 Play on one side and the Nokia G42 5G on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.2GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.

Specification comparison:

SmartphoneMotorola Moto Z2 Play Nokia G42 5G
Model version(s)

Moto Z2 Play

TA-1573, TA-1581, TA-1591
Release dateQ3 2017 Q3 2022
Dimensions6,15 x 3,00 x 0,24 in 6,50 x 2,98 x 0,34 in
Weight5.11 oz 6.84 oz
BodyFront glass,
aluminum body
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours5.5 inches, 16M colours 6.6 inches, 450 nits, 16M colours
Screen typeSuper AMOLED IPS LCD, 90Hz
Resolution1080 x 1920 pixels 720 x 1612 pixels
Screen ratio16:9 20:9
Density401 ppi 269 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 7.1.1 Android 13
ProcessorQualcomm MSM8953 Pro Snapdragon 626 Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G
Lithography14 nm LPP 8 nm LPP
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores


6x Qualcomm Kryo 460 Silver @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores

8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.2 GHz

2x Qualcomm Kryo 460 Gold @ 2.2 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 506 Qualcomm Adreno 619
GPU execution units1 2
GPU shading units96 128
GPU base clock650 MHz 825 MHz
GPU boost clock650 MHz 950 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point124.8 GFLOPS 486.4 GFLOPS
Memory3 / 4 GB RAM 4 / 6 GB RAM
Storage32 / 64 GB 128 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB Up to 1 TB

12 MP, f/1,7

50 MP, f/1,8,
2 MP,
2 MP


Front photo

5 MP, f/2,2

8 MP
Front video


WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, LE 5.1, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 3.1 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity3,000 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Ion Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 14 hours and 50 minutes ~ 15 hours
TDP4 W -
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu69,118 348,987
Android PassMark Rating2,103 8,832
Geekbench 4 single core
890 2,480
Geekbench 4 multi-core
4,269 6,623

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, they have an identical turbo frequency. The Nokia G42 5G was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.

AnTuTu - Total Score
Nokia G42 5G 348,987
Motorola Moto Z2 Play 69,118

The difference is 405%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

Android PassMark Rating
Nokia G42 5G 8,832
Motorola Moto Z2 Play 2,103

The difference in performance is 320%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Nokia G42 5G 2,480
Motorola Moto Z2 Play 890

In single core, the difference is 179%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 55%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software. © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.