Motorola Moto Z2 Play vs Nokia 4.2

Motorola Moto Z2 Play on Amazon USA
Nokia 4.2 on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Motorola Moto Z2 Play on one side and the Nokia 4.2 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.2GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.

Specification comparison:

SmartphoneMotorola Moto Z2 Play Nokia 4.2
Model version(s)

Moto Z2 Play

TA-1133, TA-1149, TA-1150,
TA-1152, TA-1157, TA-1184
Release dateQ3 2017 Q2 2019
Dimensions6,15 x 3,00 x 0,24 in 5,87 x 2,81 x 0,33 in
Weight5.11 oz 5.68 oz
BodyFront glass,
aluminum body
Front and back glass,
plastic frame
Screen size, colours5.5 inches, 16M colours 5.7 inches, 16M colours
Screen typeSuper AMOLED IPS LCD
Resolution1080 x 1920 pixels 720 x 1520 pixels
Screen ratio16:9 19:9
Density401 ppi 295 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 7.1.1 Android 9
ProcessorQualcomm MSM8953 Pro Snapdragon 626 Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439
Lithography14 nm LPP 12 nm FinFET
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores


4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.45 GHz
High performance cores

8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.2 GHz

4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.95 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsQualcomm Adreno 506 Qualcomm Adreno 505
GPU execution units1 1
GPU shading units96 96
GPU clock650 MHz 650 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point124.8 GFLOPS 48.6 GFLOPS
Memory3 / 4 GB RAM 2 / 3 GB RAM
Storage32 / 64 GB 16 / 32 GB
Memory cardUp to 256 GB Up to 400 GB

12 MP, f/1,7

13 MP, f/2,2,
2 MP


Front photo

5 MP, f/2,2

8 MP, f/2,0
Front video


WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, LE 4.2, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 3.1 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity3,000 mAh 3,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Ion Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use)~ 14 hours and 50 minutes ~ 9 hours and 10 minutes
TDP4 W 4 W
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu69,118 79,430
Android PassMark Rating2,103 2,935
Geekbench 4 single core
890 879
Geekbench 4 multi-core
4,269 3,129

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Motorola Moto Z2 Play is greater. The Nokia 4.2 was started more recently.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.

AnTuTu - Total Score
Nokia 4.2 79,430
Motorola Moto Z2 Play 69,118

The difference is 15%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

Android PassMark Rating
Nokia 4.2 2,935
Motorola Moto Z2 Play 2,103

The difference in performance is 40%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Motorola Moto Z2 Play 890
Nokia 4.2 879

In single core, the difference is 1%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 36%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software. © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.