Motorola Moto G7 Play vs Samsung Galaxy A10e

Motorola Moto G7 Play on Amazon USA
Samsung Galaxy A10e on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Motorola Moto G7 Play on one side and the Samsung Galaxy A10e on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.8GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.6GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.


Smartphone Motorola Moto G7 Play Samsung Galaxy A10e
Model version(s) XT1952, XT1952-2, XT1952-4 SM-A102U, SM-A102U1, SM-S102DL
Release date Q1 2019 Q3 2019
Dimensions 5,80 x 2,81 x 0,31 in 5,80 x 2,74 x 0,33 in
Weight 5.26 oz 4.97 oz
Body Front glass,
plastic back
Front glass,
plastic body
Screen size, colours 5.7 inches, 16M colours 5.8 inches, 16M colours
Screen type IPS LCD PLS TFT
Resolution 720 x 1512 pixels 720 x 1560 pixels
Screen ratio 19:9 19.5:9
Density 294 ppi 295 ppi
Operating system Android 9.0 Android 9.0
Processor Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884
Lithography 14 nm LPP 14 nm FinFET
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Energy cores 4x Qualcomm Kryo 250 Silver @ 1.8 GHz 6x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.35 GHz
High performance cores 4x Qualcomm Kryo 250 Gold @ 1.8 GHz 2x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 1.6 GHz
GPU integrated graphics Qualcomm Adreno 506 ARM Mali-G71 MP2
GPU execution units 1 2
GPU shading units 96 32
GPU base clock rate 725 MHz 770 MHz
GPU max clock rate 725 MHz 1,300 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 124.8 GFLOPS 49.3 GFLOPS
Memory 2 GB RAM 2 GB RAM
Storage 32 GB 32 GB
Memory card Up to 1,000 GB Up to 512 GB
Photo 13 MP, f/2,0 8 MP, f/1,9
Video 2160p30,
Front photo 8 MP, f/2,2 5 MP, f/2,0
Front video 1080p30 720p30
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 4.2, A2DP, LE 5.0, A2DP, LE
USB USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity 3,000 mAh 3,000 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Ion Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 9 hours and 20 minutes ~ 14 hours
TDP 7 W 8 W
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
AnTuTu 96,674 101,268
Android PassMark Rating 2,158 1,661
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
1,194 1,108
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
4,091 3,438

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Motorola Moto G7 Play is greater. They were produced the same year.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.

AnTuTu - Total score
Samsung Galaxy A10e 101,268
Motorola Moto G7 Play 96,674

The difference is 5%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

Android PassMark Rating
Motorola Moto G7 Play 2,158
Samsung Galaxy A10e 1,661

The difference in performance is 30%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Motorola Moto G7 Play 1,194
Samsung Galaxy A10e 1,108

In single core, the difference is 8%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 19%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

See also:

Samsung Galaxy A10Samsung Galaxy A10s © 2021 - Information - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland