FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Motorola Moto E30 vs Samsung I9505 Galaxy S4
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Motorola Moto E30 on one side and the Samsung I9505 Galaxy S4 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.9GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Motorola Moto E30 | Samsung I9505 Galaxy S4 | ||||||
| Model version(s) | Moto E30, XT2158-6, XT2159-6 | SC-04E, GT-I9505, GT-I9515, SGH-I337 | ||||||
| Release date | Q4 2021 | Q1 2013 | ||||||
| Network | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,5 x 2,98 x 0,36 in | 5,38 x 2,75 x 0,31 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.98 oz | 4.59 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, plastic body |
Plastic body | ||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.5 inches, 16M colours | 5.0 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED | ||||||
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 16:9 | ||||||
| Density | 270 ppi | 441 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 4.2.2 | ||||||
| Processor | Unisoc Tiger T700 | Qualcomm APQ8064T Snapdragon 600 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm FF | 28 nm LP | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 4 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz |
- | ||||||
| High performance cores | 2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.0 GHz |
4x Qualcomm Krait 300 @ 1.9 GHz | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G52 MC2 | Qualcomm Adreno 320 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 1 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 32 | 64 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | - | 400 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 850 MHz | 400 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 54.4 GFLOPS | 51.2 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 32 GB | 16 / 64 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 256 GB | Up to 64 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 48 MP, f/1,8, 26mm, 2 MP, f/2,4, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
13 MP, f/2,2, 31mm |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps | ||||||
| Front photo | 8 MP, f/2,0 |
2 MP, f/2,4, 31mm |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps | ||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 2,600 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Ion | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 15 hours | ~ 9 hours and 30 minutes | ||||||
| TDP | - | 5 W | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| DxOMark | - | 75 | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 122,368 | 31,640 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 3,228 | 851 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Motorola Moto E30 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Motorola Moto E30 is greater. The Motorola Moto E30 has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total Score | |
|---|---|
Motorola Moto E30 | 122,368 |
| Samsung I9505 Galaxy S4 | 31,640 |
The difference is 287%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Motorola Moto E30 | 3,228 |
| Samsung I9505 Galaxy S4 | 851 |
The difference in performance is 279%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
See also:
Motorola Moto E32Motorola Moto E32sDisclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.