FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Motorola Moto E13 vs Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Motorola Moto E13 on one side and the Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.6GHz. The second chips has a total of 1 cores, 1 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Motorola Moto E13 | Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus | ||||||
| Model version(s) | Moto E13 | SM-G350, SM-G350E | ||||||
| Release date | Q1 2023 | Q3 2014 | ||||||
| Network | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,46 x 2,95 x 0,33 in | 5,10 x 2,59 x 0,37 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.35 oz | 4.55 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, plastic body |
Plastic body | ||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.5 inches, 16M colours | 4.3 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD | TFT | ||||||
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels | 480 x 800pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 20:9 | 5:3 | ||||||
| Density | 270 ppi | 217 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 13 (Go Edition) | Android 4.4.2 | ||||||
| Processor | Unisoc Tiger T606 | Unisoc SC7715 | ||||||
| Lithography | 12 nm FF | 28 nm HPM | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 1 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 1 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.6 GHz |
- | ||||||
| High performance cores | 2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 1.6 GHz |
1x ARM Cortex-A7 @ 1.2 GHz | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-G57 MC2 | ARM Mali-400 MP1 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 32 | 32 | ||||||
| GPU base clock | 650 MHz | 210 MHz | ||||||
| GPU boost clock | 650 MHz | 500 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 243.2 GFLOPS | 5.4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 2 / 4 GB RAM | 512 MB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 64 GB | 4 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 1 TB | Up to 32 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 13 MP, f/2,2 |
3,15 MP |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
320p | ||||||
| Front photo | 5 MP, f/2,4 |
- |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
- | ||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.0, A2DP | ||||||
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 1,800 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Ion | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 12 hours | ~ 17 hours | ||||||
| TDP | - | 3 W | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 182,824 | 6,643 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,477 | 362 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 4,594 | 340 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Motorola Moto E13 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Motorola Moto E13 is greater. The Motorola Moto E13 has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total Score | |
|---|---|
Motorola Moto E13 | 182,824 |
| Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus | 6,643 |
The difference is 2652%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
With Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Motorola Moto E13 |
1,477 4,594 |
| Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus |
362 340 |
In single core, the difference is 308%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1251%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.