Motorola Moto E13 vs Samsung Galaxy S6
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Motorola Moto E13 on one side and the Samsung Galaxy S6 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.6GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.1GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Smartphone | | Motorola Moto E13 |
| | | Samsung Galaxy S6 | | |
Model version(s) | |
Moto E13
| | | |
SC-05G, SM-G9200, SM-G9208,
SM-G9208/SS, SM-G9209, SM-G920A,
SM-G920F, SM-G920FD, SM-G920I,
SM-G920K, SM-G920L, SM-G920S,
SM-G920T
| | |
Release date | | Q1 2023 |
| | | Q1 2015 | | |
Network | | GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| | | GSM, HSPA, LTE | | |
Dimensions | | 6,46 x 2,95 x 0,33 in |
| | | 5,65 x 2,78 x 0,27 in | | |
Weight | | 6.35 oz |
| | | 4.87 oz | | |
Body | | Front glass,
plastic body |
| | | Front and back glass,
aluminum frame | | |
Screen size, colours | | 6.5 inches, 16M colours |
| | | 5.1 inches, 16M colours | | |
Screen type | | IPS LCD |
| | | Super AMOLED | | |
Resolution | | 720 x 1600 pixels |
| | | 1440 x 2560 pixels | | |
Screen ratio | | 20:9 |
| | | 16:9 | | |
Density | | 270 ppi |
| | | 577 ppi | | |
Operating system | | Android 13 (Go Edition) |
| | | Android 5.0.2 | | |
Processor | | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
| | | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 | | |
Lithography | | 12 nm FF |
| | | 14 nm LPE | | |
Cores | | 8 |
| | | 8 | | |
Threads | | 8 |
| | | 8 | | |
Energy cores | | 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.6 GHz
|
| | | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.5 GHz
| | |
High performance cores | | 2x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 1.6 GHz
|
| | | 4x ARM Cortex-A57 @ 2.1 GHz
| | |
GPU integrated graphics | | ARM Mali-G57 MC2 |
| | | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 | | |
GPU execution units | | 2 |
| | | 8 | | |
GPU shading units | | 32 |
| | | 128 | | |
GPU clock | | 650 MHz |
| | | 772 MHz | | |
GPU FP32 floating point | | 243.2 GFLOPS |
| | | 210 GFLOPS | | |
Memory | | 2 / 4 GB RAM |
| | | 3 GB RAM | | |
Storage | | 64 GB |
| | | 32 / 128 GB | | |
Memory card | | Up to 1 TB |
| | | - |
| |
Photo | | 13 MP, f/2,2
|
| | | 16 MP, f/1,9, 28mm
|
| |
Video | | 1080p@30fps
|
| | | 4K@30fps,
1080p@60fps,
720p@120fps
| | |
Front photo | | 5 MP, f/2,4
|
| | | 5 MP, f/1,9, 22mm
|
| |
Front video | | 1080p@30fps
|
| | | 1440p@30fps
| | |
WLAN | | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| | | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | | |
Bluetooth | | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| | | 4.1, A2DP, LE | | |
USB | | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| | | microUSB 2.0 | | |
Battery capacity | | 5,000 mAh |
| | | 2,550 mAh | | |
Battery type | | Non removable Li-Po |
| | | Non removable Li-Ion | | |
Battery life (versatile use) | | ~ 12 hours |
| | | ~ 9 hours and 30 minutes | | |
TDP | | - |
| | | 7 W | | |
Head SAR | | - |
| | | - | | |
Body SAR | | - |
| | | - | | |
DxOMark | | - |
| | | 82 | | |
AnTuTu | | 182,824 |
| | | 81,184 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 4 single core | | 1,477 |
| | | 1,249 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | | 4,594 |
| | | 3,997 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 5 single core | | 314 |
| | | 280 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | | 1,203 |
| | | 834 | | |
Amazon | |  |
| | |  |
| |
eBay | |  |
| | |  |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Samsung Galaxy S6 is larger. The Motorola Moto E13 has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
The difference is 125%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
With Android:In single core, the difference is 18%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 15%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
With Android:In single core, the difference is 12%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 44%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S10 5G SD855Samsung Galaxy S10 ExynosSamsung Galaxy S10 LiteSamsung Galaxy S10 SD855Samsung Galaxy S10+ ExynosSamsung Galaxy S10+ SD855Samsung Galaxy S10e ExynosSamsung Galaxy S10e SD855Samsung Galaxy S20 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 5G SD865Samsung Galaxy S20 ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 FE 2022Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5GSamsung Galaxy S20 FE ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 FE SD865Samsung Galaxy S20 SD865Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G SD865Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra SD865Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20+ 5G SD865Samsung Galaxy S20+ ExynosSamsung Galaxy S20+ SD865Samsung Galaxy S21 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 SD888Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S21+ 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S21+ 5G SD888Samsung Galaxy S22 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S22 5G SnapdragonSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G SnapdragonSamsung Galaxy S22+ 5G ExynosSamsung Galaxy S22+ 5G SnapdragonSamsung Galaxy S23Samsung Galaxy S23 FE ExynosSamsung Galaxy S23 FE SnapdragonSamsung Galaxy S23 UltraSamsung Galaxy S23+Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini I9195ISamsung Galaxy S5Samsung Galaxy S5 (octa-core)Samsung Galaxy S5 MiniSamsung Galaxy S5 NeoSamsung Galaxy S6 EdgeSamsung Galaxy S6 Edge+Samsung Galaxy S6 SprintSamsung Galaxy S7 ActiveSamsung Galaxy S7 Edge ExynosSamsung Galaxy S7 Edge SD820Samsung Galaxy S7 ExynosSamsung Galaxy S7 SD820Samsung Galaxy S8 ExynosSamsung Galaxy S8 SD835Samsung Galaxy S8+ ExynosSamsung Galaxy S8+ SD835Samsung Galaxy S9 ExynosSamsung Galaxy S9 SD845Samsung Galaxy S9+ ExynosSamsung Galaxy S9+ SD845Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus