Motorola Edge 40 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo

Motorola Edge 40 on Amazon USA
Motorola Edge 40 Neo on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Motorola Edge 40 on one side and the Motorola Edge 40 Neo on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.6GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.5GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.

Specification comparison:

SmartphoneMotorola Edge 40 Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Model version(s)


Release dateQ2 2023 Q3 2023
Dimensions6,24 x 2,83 x 0,30 in 6,24 x 2,83 x 0,30 in
Weight5.89 oz 6.00 oz
BodyFront glass,
back plastic,
aluminum frame
Front glass,
back body
Screen size, colours6.6 inches, 1200 nits, 16M colours 6.6 inches, 1300 nits, 1B colours
Screen typeP-OLED, 144Hz P-OLED, 144Hz
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen ratio20:9 20:9
Density402 ppi 402 ppi
Operating systemAndroid 13 Android 13
ProcessorMediaTek Dimensity 8020 MediaTek Dimensity 7030
Lithography6 nm N6 6 nm N6
Cores8 8
Threads8 8
Energy cores

4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz

6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz
High performance cores

4x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.6 GHz

2x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.5 GHz
GPU integrated graphicsARM Mali-G77 MC9 ARM Mali-G610 MC3
GPU execution units9 3
GPU shading units144 48
GPU base clock850 MHz 600 MHz
GPU boost clock850 MHz 1,000 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point800.2 GFLOPS 1,008 GFLOPS
Memory8 GB RAM 8 / 12 GB RAM
Storage128 / 256 GB 128 / 256 GB

50 MP, f/1,4,
13 MP, f/2,2

50 MP, f/1,8,
13 MP, f/2,2


Front photo

32 MP, f/2,4

32 MP, f/2,4
Front video


WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE 5.4, A2DP, LE
USBUSB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0
Battery capacity4,400 mAh 5,000 mAh
Battery typeNon removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Po
Battery life (versatile use)~ 12 hours ~ 15 hours
Head SAR- -
Body SAR- -
AnTuTu771,574 516,478
Android PassMark Rating13,331 11,953
Geekbench 4 single core
3,933 3,559
Geekbench 4 multi-core
12,542 8,508
Geekbench 5 single core
759 783
Geekbench 5 multi-core
3,301 2,239
Geekbench 6 single core
1,107 1,057
Geekbench 6 multi-core
3,598 2,533

We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Motorola Edge 40 is greater. They were produced the same year.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

Performance comparison with the benchmarks:

Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.

AnTuTu - Total Score
Motorola Edge 40 771,574
Motorola Edge 40 Neo 516,478

The difference is 49%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

Android PassMark Rating
Motorola Edge 40 13,331
Motorola Edge 40 Neo 11,953

The difference in performance is 12%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

With Android:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Motorola Edge 40 3,933
Motorola Edge 40 Neo 3,559

In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 47%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

With Android:

Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Motorola Edge 40 759
Motorola Edge 40 Neo 783

In single core, the difference is -3%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 47%.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

With Android:

Geekbench 6 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android
Motorola Edge 40 1,107
Motorola Edge 40 Neo 1,057

In single core, the difference is 5%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 42%.

Geekbench 6 is a benchmarking platform that is capable of evaluating the performance of a device across multiple operating systems. The software evaluates processor power, with its ability to support different tasks, such as file compression, browsing; GPU computing capabilities, with image editing, video editing, gaming skills, machine learning workloads. © 2024 - About us - XML sitemap - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact


When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland