Motorola Edge 20 Pro vs Lenovo Phab 2 Plus

Motorola Edge 20 Pro on Amazon USA
Lenovo Phab 2 Plus on Amazon USA

Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Motorola Edge 20 Pro on one side and the Lenovo Phab 2 Plus on the other. The first has a processor with 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximale frequency of 3.2GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.3GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.






Specification comparison:


Smartphone Motorola Edge 20 Pro Lenovo Phab 2 Plus
Model version(s)

XT2153-1

PB2-670M, PB2-670N
Release date Q3 2021 Q2 2016
Network 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE GSM, HSPA, LTE
Dimensions 6,42 x 2,99 x 0,31 in 6,85 x 3,48 x 0,38 in
Weight 6.53 oz 7.69 oz
Body Front glass,
aluminum frame,
plastic back
Front and back glass,
aluminum frame
Screen size, colours 6.7 inches, 1B colours 6.4 inches, 16M colours
Screen type OLED, 144Hz IPS LCD
Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels 1080 x 1920 pixels
Screen ratio 19.5:9 16:9
Density 385 ppi 344 ppi
Operating system Android 11 Android 6
Processor Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G MediaTek MT8783
Lithography 7 nm N7FF+ 28 nm HPM
Cores 8 8
Threads 8 8
Energy cores

4x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Silver @ 1.8 GHz

-
High performance cores

1x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Prime @ 3.2 GHz
3x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Gold @ 2.4 GHz

8x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.3 GHz
GPU integrated graphics Qualcomm Adreno 650 ARM Mali-T720 MP3
GPU execution units 2 3
GPU shading units 512 48
GPU clock 670 MHz 700 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point 1,372.1 GFLOPS 30.6 GFLOPS
Memory 6 / 12 GB RAM 3 GB RAM
Storage 128 / 256 GB 32 GB
Memory card - Up to 128 GB
Photo

108 MP, f/1,9,
8 MP, f/3,4, 126mm,
16 MP, f/2,2, 13mm

13 MP, f/2,0
2 MP
Video

8K@24fps,
4K@30/60fps,
1080p@30/60/240/960fps

1080p@30fps
Front photo

32 MP, f/2,3

8 MP, f/2,2
Front video

4K@30fps,
1080p@30/120fps

1080p@30fps
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth 5.1, A2DP, LE 4.0, A2DP, LE
USB USB Type-C 3.1 microUSB 2.0
Battery capacity 4,500 mAh 4,050 mAh
Battery type Non removable Li-Po Non removable Li-Ion
Battery life (versatile use) ~ 13 hours and 30 minutes ~ 12 hours
Head SAR - -
Body SAR - -
AnTuTu 710,116 37,755
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 single core
4,437 602
(Android 64-bit)
Geekbench 4 multi-core
11,654 2,414
Amazon
eBay



We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. Both phones have an equivalent number of cores, the maximum frequency of Motorola Edge 20 Pro is greater. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a newer release date.

Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...



Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.



Performance comparison with the benchmarks:


Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.


AnTuTu - Total score
Motorola Edge 20 Pro 710,116
Lenovo Phab 2 Plus 37,755


The difference is 1781%.


AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.


On Android 64-bit:

Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit
Motorola Edge 20 Pro 4,437
11,654
Lenovo Phab 2 Plus 602
2,414


In single core, the difference is 637%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 383%.


Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.




GadgetVersus.com © 2023 - XML sitemap - Information - Privacy policy - Advertising policy - Contact

Disclaimer:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.


Information:

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.


Trading System Forex W3Ask W3Ask Brasil W3Ask Deutschland W3Ask España W3Ask France W3Ask Italia W3Ask Nederland