FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
LG K22+ vs Xiaomi Mi 10S
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the LG K22+ on one side and the Xiaomi Mi 10S on the other. The first has a processor with 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.3GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench 4.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | LG K22+ | Xiaomi Mi 10S | ||||||
| Model version(s) | LMK200BAW, LMK200HA, LMK200HAW |
M2102J2SC |
||||||
| Release date | Q3 2020 | Q1 2021 | ||||||
| Network | GSM, HSPA, LTE | 5G, GSM, HSPA, LTE | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,20 x 2,97 x 0,33 in | 6,40 x 2,94 x 0,35 in | ||||||
| Weight | 6.00 oz | 7.34 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, plastic body |
Front and back glass, aluminum frame |
||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.2 inches, 400 nits, 16M colours | 6.7 inches, 500 nits, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz | ||||||
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels | 1080 x 2340 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 19:9 | 19.5:9 | ||||||
| Density | 271 ppi | 386 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 10 | Android 11; MIUI 12 | ||||||
| Processor | Qualcomm QM215 Snapdragon 215 | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm LP | 7 nm N7FF+ | ||||||
| Cores | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 4 | 8 | ||||||
| Energy cores | - |
4x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Silver @ 1.8 GHz |
||||||
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.3 GHz |
1x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Prime @ 3.2 GHz 3x Qualcomm Kryo 585 Gold @ 2.4 GHz |
||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 308 | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 24 | 512 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 485 MHz | 670 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 24 GFLOPS | 1,372.1 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 3 GB RAM | 8 / 12 GB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 64 GB | 128 / 256 GB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 128 GB | - | ||||||
| Photo | 13 MP, 27mm, 2 MP |
108 MP, f/1,7, 26mm, 13 MP, f/2,4, 2 MP, f/2,4, 2 MP, f/2,4 |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
||||||
| Front photo | 5 MP, f/2,2, 24mm |
20 MP |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE | ||||||
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | 4,780 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Po | Non removable Li-Po | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 9 hours | ~ 13 hours and 20 minutes | ||||||
| TDP | 6 W | - | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| Body SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 53,103 | 662,302 | ||||||
| Android PassMark Rating | 632 | 15,883 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 583 | 4,593 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 1,634 | 13,263 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 single core | 92 | 958 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | 321 | 3,022 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Xiaomi Mi 10S has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Xiaomi Mi 10S is larger. The Xiaomi Mi 10S was started more recently.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu - Total score | |
|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 10S |
662,302 |
| LG K22+ |
53,103 |
The difference is 1147%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Android PassMark Rating | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi Mi 10S |
15,883 |
| LG K22+ |
632 |
The difference in performance is 2413%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi Mi 10S |
4,593 13,263 |
| LG K22+ |
583 1,634 |
In single core, the difference is 688%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 712%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Android:
| Geekbench 5 - Multi-core & single core score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Xiaomi Mi 10S |
958 3,022 |
| LG K22+ |
92 321 |
In single core, the difference is 941%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 841%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
LG K22Xiaomi Mi 10 5GXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GXiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5GXiaomi Mi 10 UltraXiaomi Mi 10i 5GXiaomi Mi 10T 5GXiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5GXiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.