FR- Home page
-
Smartphone - Comparison
Infinix Zero 4 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Infinix Zero 4 Plus on one side and the Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 10 cores, 10 threads, a maximale frequency of 2.0GHz. The second chips has a total of 1 cores, 1 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.0GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specification comparison:
| Smartphone | Infinix Zero 4 Plus | Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830 | ||||||
| Model version(s) | X574, X602 | GT-S5830 | ||||||
| Release date | Q1 2017 | Q1 2011 | ||||||
| Network | GSM, HSPA, LTE | GSM, HSPA | ||||||
| Dimensions | 6,32 x 3,27 x 0,33 in | 4,43 x 2,36 x 0,45 in | ||||||
| Weight | 7.16 oz | 3.99 oz | ||||||
| Body | Front glass, aluminum frame |
Front glass, plastic body | ||||||
| Screen size, colours | 6.0 inches, 16M colours | 3.5 inches, 16M colours | ||||||
| Screen type | IPS LCD | TFT | ||||||
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels | 320 x 480 pixels | ||||||
| Screen ratio | 16:9 | 3:2 | ||||||
| Density | 368 ppi | 165 ppi | ||||||
| Operating system | Android 6 (Marshmallow) | Android 2.3 (Gingerbread); TouchWiz UI 3 | ||||||
| Processor | MediaTek MT6797M Helio X20 | Qualcomm MSM7227A Snapdragon S1 | ||||||
| Lithography | 20 nm HPM | 45 nm | ||||||
| Cores | 10 | 1 | ||||||
| Threads | 10 | 1 | ||||||
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz |
- | ||||||
| High performance cores | 2x ARM Cortex-A72 @ 2.0 GHz 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.85 GHz |
1x ARM Cortex-A5 @ 1 GHz | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | ARM Mali-T880 MP4 | Qualcomm Adreno 200 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 4 | 1 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 64 | 2 | ||||||
| GPU clock | 780 MHz | 245 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 136 GFLOPS | 3.92 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Memory | 4 GB RAM | 158 MB RAM | ||||||
| Storage | 64 GB | 278 MB | ||||||
| Memory card | Up to 128 GB | Up to 32 GB | ||||||
| Photo | 21 MP, f/2,0 |
5 MP, f/2,6 |
||||||
| Video | 1080p@30fps |
480p@24fps | ||||||
| Front photo | 13 MP, f/2,2 |
- |
||||||
| Front video | 1080p@30fps |
- | ||||||
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | ||||||
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 2.1, A2DP | ||||||
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 | ||||||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 1,350 mAh | ||||||
| Battery type | Non removable Li-Ion | Non removable Li-Ion | ||||||
| Battery life (versatile use) | ~ 12 hours | ~ 7 hours | ||||||
| Head SAR | - | - | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 85,821 | 3,124 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,136 | 314 | ||||||
| (Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 4,636 | 298 | ||||||
| Amazon |  |
|
||||||
| eBay |  |
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Infinix Zero 4 Plus has more cores, the maximum frequency of Infinix Zero 4 Plus is greater. The Infinix Zero 4 Plus has a newer release date.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
| AnTuTu - Total Score | |
|---|---|
Infinix Zero 4 Plus | 85,821 |
| Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830 | 3,124 |
The difference is 2647%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
With Android:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-core & Single Core Score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Infinix Zero 4 Plus |
1,136 4,636 |
| Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830 |
314 298 |
In single core, the difference is 262%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1456%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Disclaimer:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.