Huawei Y5 (2018) vs Oppo Reno2
Comparison of the technical features between smartphones, with the Huawei Y5 (2018) on one side and the Oppo Reno2 on the other, also their respective performances with the benchmarks. The first has a processor with 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximale frequency of 1.5GHz. The second chips has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the amount of RAM memory, the date of first broadcast, the values obtained in Geekbench.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
This page contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our advertising policy, please
visit this page.
Specification comparison:
Smartphone | | Huawei Y5 (2018) |
| | | Oppo Reno2 | | |
Model version(s) | |
ATU-AL10, DRA-AL00, DRA-L01,
DRA-L21, DRA-LX2, DRA-TL00,
DUA-L21, DUA-LX2, DRA-LX3
| | | |
Oppo CPH1907
| | |
Release date | | Q2 2018 |
| | | Q3 2019 | | |
Network | | GSM, HSPA, LTE |
| | | GSM, HSPA, LTE | | |
Dimensions | | 5,77 x 2,79 x 0,33 in |
| | | 6,30 x 2,93 x 0,37 in | | |
Weight | | 5.01 oz |
| | | 6.67 oz | | |
Body | | Front glass,
plastic body |
| | | Front and back glass,
aluminum frame | | |
Screen size, colours | | 5.5 inches, 16M colours |
| | | 6.5 inches, 16M colours | | |
Screen type | | LCD |
| | | AMOLED | | |
Resolution | | 720 x 1440 pixels |
| | | 1080 x 2400 pixels | | |
Screen ratio | | 18:9 |
| | | 19.5:9 | | |
Density | | 295 ppi |
| | | 401 ppi | | |
Operating system | | Android 8.1 (Oreo); EMUI 8 |
| | | Android 9; ColorOS 6.1 | | |
Processor | | MediaTek MT6739 |
| | | Qualcomm SM7150-AB Snapdragon 730G | | |
Lithography | | 28 nm HPM |
| | | 8 nm LPP | | |
Cores | | 4 |
| | | 8 | | |
Threads | | 4 |
| | | 8 | | |
Energy cores | | -
|
| | | 6x Qualcomm Kryo 470 Silver @ 1.8 GHz
| | |
High performance cores | | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.5 GHz
|
| | | 2x Qualcomm Kryo 470 Gold @ 2.2 GHz
| | |
GPU integrated graphics | | Imagination PowerVR GE8100 |
| | | Qualcomm Adreno 618 | | |
GPU execution units | | 1 |
| | | 2 | | |
GPU shading units | | 16 |
| | | 128 | | |
GPU clock | | 570 MHz |
| | | 610 MHz | | |
GPU FP32 floating point | | 20.8 GFLOPS |
| | | 422.4 GFLOPS | | |
Memory | | 1 / 2 GB RAM |
| | | 8 GB RAM | | |
Storage | | 16 / 32 GB |
| | | 128 / 256 GB | | |
Memory card | | Up to 256 GB |
| | | Up to 256 GB |
| |
Photo | | 13 MP, f/2,0
|
| | | 48 MP, f/1,7, 26mm,
13MP, f/2,4,
8 MP, f/2,2, 13mm,
2 MP B/W, f/2,4
|
| |
Video | | 1080p@30fps
|
| | | 4K@30fps,
1080p@30/60fps
| | |
Front photo | | 5 MP
|
| | | 16 MP, f/2,0, 26mm
|
| |
Front video | | 1080p@30fps
|
| | | 1080p@30fps
| | |
WLAN | | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| | | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | | |
Bluetooth | | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| | | 5.0, A2DP, LE | | |
USB | | microUSB 2.0 |
| | | USB Type-C | | |
Battery capacity | | 3,020 mAh |
| | | 4,000 mAh | | |
Battery type | | Non removable Li-Ion |
| | | Non removable Li-Po | | |
Battery life (versatile use) | | ~ 11 hours and 30 minutes |
| | | ~ 15 hours | | |
TDP | | - |
| | | 11 W | | |
Head SAR | | - |
| | | - | | |
Body SAR | | - |
| | | - | | |
AnTuTu | | 38,766 |
| | | 258,657 | | |
Android PassMark Rating | | 1,144 |
| | | 6,676 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 4 single core | | 656 |
| | | 2,552 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 4 multi-core | | 1,761 |
| | | 6,904 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 5 single core | | 120 |
| | | 537 | | |
(Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core | | 346 |
| | | 1,756 | | |
Amazon | |  |
| | |  |
| |
eBay | |  |
| | |  |
| |
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above.
We can easily compare the technical characteristics between these two smartphones. The phone Oppo Reno2 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Oppo Reno2 is larger. The Oppo Reno2 was started more recently.
Autonomy: the autonomy given is the one for a versatile use with video playback, web browsing, various applications, games, photos, etc ...
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
Performance comparison with the benchmarks:
Performance comparison between the two smartphones, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark softwares such as Geekbench.
The difference is 567%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
The difference in performance is 484%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
With Android:In single core, the difference is 289%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 292%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
With Android:In single core, the difference is 348%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 408%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these smartphones, you may get different results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
See also:
Oppo RenoOppo Reno 10x ZoomOppo Reno 5GOppo Reno AOppo Reno AceOppo Reno Ace 2 5GOppo Reno ZOppo Reno10Oppo Reno10 ProOppo Reno10 Pro+Oppo Reno11Oppo Reno11 ProOppo Reno2 FOppo Reno2 ZOppo Reno3Oppo Reno3 5GOppo Reno3 ProOppo Reno3 Pro 5GOppo Reno3 YouthOppo Reno4Oppo Reno4 5GOppo Reno4 FOppo Reno4 LiteOppo Reno4 ProOppo Reno4 Pro 5GOppo Reno4 SEOppo Reno4 Z 5GOppo Reno5 4GOppo Reno5 5GOppo Reno5 A 5GOppo Reno5 FOppo Reno5 K 5GOppo Reno5 LiteOppo Reno5 Pro 5GOppo Reno5 Pro+ 5GOppo Reno5 ZOppo Reno6Oppo Reno6 5GOppo Reno6 LiteOppo Reno6 Pro 5GOppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)Oppo Reno6 Pro+ 5GOppo Reno6 Z 5GOppo Reno7Oppo Reno7 5GOppo Reno7 Lite 5GOppo Reno7 Pro 5GOppo Reno7 SE 5GOppo Reno7 Z 5GOppo Reno8 4GOppo Reno8 5GOppo Reno8 Lite 5GOppo Reno8 Pro 5GOppo Reno8 Pro+ 5GOppo Reno8 TOppo Reno8 T 5GOppo Reno8 Z 5GOppo Reno9Oppo Reno9 ProOppo Reno9 Pro+